Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R vs Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630
VS
The verdict
AB-G12R-132-630 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.94 pp more efficient. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 7 differencesHow alike are they
12
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
7 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
PE-132-605-THGB-G12R
AB-G12R-132-630
Difference
Module efficiency
22.40 %
23.34 %
0.94 pp more efficient
Power density
224.0 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
9.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
605 Wp
630 Wp
25 W more power
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Weight per kWp
55.4 kg/kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
2.0 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
2382x1134x35 mm
2382x1133x30 mm
2382x1134x35 mm vs 2382x1133x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
PE-132-605-THGB-G12R
20,299 kWh
AB-G12R-132-630
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
839 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
PE-132-605-THGB-G12R
AB-G12R-132-630
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
605 W
630 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
579 W
604 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
552 W
577 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
526 W
551 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
PE-132-605-THGB-G12R
AB-G12R-132-630
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
605 Wp
630 Wp
+25 W for AB-G12R-132-630
Module efficiency
22.40 %
23.34 %
+0.94 pp for AB-G12R-132-630
Power density
224.0 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
+9.5 Wp/m² for AB-G12R-132-630
Open-circuit voltage
48.93 V
48.80 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.21 V
41.72 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
15.61 A
15.94 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
14.68 A
15.11 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for AB-G12R-132-630
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x35 mm
2382x1133x30 mm
2382x1134x35 mm vs 2382x1133x30 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
2.699 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
33.5 kg
33.6 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
55.4 kg/kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
-2.0 kg/kWp for AB-G12R-132-630
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,834
vs
#981
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 3,853 places
Power density
#4,841
vs
#971
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 3,870 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#1,347
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 873 places
Weight
#9,888
vs
#7,304
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 2,584 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,755
vs
#1,986
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 1,769 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-615-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R or Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
According to our database: Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 22.40%); Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R and Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R use vs Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R uses N-type cells; Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R and Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R has a 30 years power warranty; Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R and Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 bifacial panels?
Both Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R and Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.