Skip to main content
600-THGB-G12R vs 630-THGB-G12R 14 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R

Premier Energies
PE-132-600-THGB-G12R
600 Wp 22.21 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Premier Energies
PE-132-630-THGB-G12R
630 Wp 23.32 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

630-THGB-G12R leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.11 pp more efficient. 14 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
14 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

5 of 19 parameters
Parameter 600-THGB-G12R 630-THGB-G12R Difference
Module efficiency 22.21 % 23.32 % 1.11 pp more efficient
Power density 222.1 Wp/m² 233.2 Wp/m² 11.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 600 Wp 630 Wp 30 W more power
Weight per kWp 55.8 kg/kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 2.7 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 41.03 V 42.13 V 1.10 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
600-THGB-G12R
20,131 kWh
630-THGB-G12R
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,007 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 600-THGB-G12R 630-THGB-G12R
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 600 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 574 W 603 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 548 W 575 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 522 W 548 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 600-THGB-G12R 630-THGB-G12R Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 600 Wp 630 Wp +30 W for 630-THGB-G12R
Module efficiency 22.21 % 23.32 % +1.11 pp for 630-THGB-G12R
Power density 222.1 Wp/m² 233.2 Wp/m² +11.1 Wp/m² for 630-THGB-G12R
Open-circuit voltage 48.79 V 49.61 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.03 V 42.13 V 1.10 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.60 A 15.65 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.63 A 14.96 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x35 mm 2382x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 33.5 kg 33.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.8 kg/kWp 53.2 kg/kWp -2.7 kg/kWp for 630-THGB-G12R
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,817 vs #1,012
630-THGB-G12R leads by 4,805 places
Power density
#5,846 vs #1,042
630-THGB-G12R leads by 4,804 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,301 vs #7,054
630-THGB-G12R leads by 3,247 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,219 vs #2,003
630-THGB-G12R leads by 2,216 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-615-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R or Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R?
According to our database: Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R has higher module efficiency (23.32% vs 22.21%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R?
Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R has a module efficiency of 22.21%, while Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R is 23.32%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R use vs Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R?
Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R uses N-type cells; Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R?
Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R has a 30 years power warranty; Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R bifacial panels?
Both Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.