Skip to main content
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs PS695M13GFH-22/WNH 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH

Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
700 Wp 22.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
695 Wp 22.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
23,486 kWh
PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
23,319 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario PS700M13GFH-22/WNH PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 700 W 695 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 670 W 665 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 639 W 635 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 609 W 604 W
03

Full specification

Parameter PS700M13GFH-22/WNH PS695M13GFH-22/WNH Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 700 Wp 695 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.53 % 22.37 % Effectively the same
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.42 V 48.22 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.39 V 40.20 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.38 A 18.32 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.35 A 17.30 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.7 kg 37.7 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.9 kg/kWp 54.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#4,041 vs #5,032
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 991 places
Power density
#4,048 vs #4,939
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 891 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,080 vs #8,573
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 493 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#937 vs #1,124
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 187 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH or Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
According to our database: Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH has higher module efficiency (22.53% vs 22.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH has a module efficiency of 22.53%, while Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH use vs Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH uses TOPCon cells; Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH bifacial panels?
Both Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 Phono Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.