Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
VS
The verdict
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 11 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 7 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
7 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
NS-720MH-132
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight
34.0 kg
37.9 kg
3.9 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
47.2 kg/kWp
52.3 kg/kWp
5.1 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2384x1303x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
NS-720MH-132
24,157 kWh
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
NS-720MH-132
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
689 W
699 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
657 W
673 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
626 W
647 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
NS-720MH-132
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
725 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
23.17 %
23.34 %
Effectively the same
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
50.00 V
50.31 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.89 V
42.25 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.00 A
18.24 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.19 A
17.16 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
34.0 kg
37.9 kg
-3.9 kg for NS-720MH-132
Weight per kWp
47.2 kg/kWp
52.3 kg/kWp
-5.1 kg/kWp for NS-720MH-132
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Annual degradation
-
0.38 %/yr
Not published by Phono Solar
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,518
vs
#981
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 537 places
Power density
#1,390
vs
#974
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 416 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#13
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 2,207 places
Weight
#1,588
vs
#5,799
NS-720MH-132 leads by 4,211 places
Warranty
#9,912
vs
#21
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#689
vs
#255
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 434 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-710MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-700MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-690MH-132
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-670MH-132
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-665MH-132
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 or Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW?
According to our database: Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 23.17%); Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 and Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 has a module efficiency of 23.17%, while Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 use vs Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 uses N-type cells; Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 and Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 has a 25 years power warranty; Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 and Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW bifacial panels?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 5 Phono Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.