Skip to main content
665MH-132 vs 700MH-132 8 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-700MH-132

NS-665MH-132
665 Wp 21.40 % TOPCon Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
NS-700MH-132
700 Wp 22.53 % N-type Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

700MH-132 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.13 pp more efficient. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
8 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 18 parameters
Parameter 665MH-132 700MH-132 Difference
Module efficiency 21.40 % 22.53 % 1.13 pp more efficient
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Power density 214.1 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² 11.3 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 665 Wp 700 Wp 35 W more power
Weight 38.7 kg 34.0 kg 4.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 58.2 kg/kWp 48.6 kg/kWp 9.6 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 45.60 V 49.68 V 4.08 V apart
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Short-circuit current 18.69 A 17.61 A 1.08 A apart
Voltage at max power 38.50 V 41.29 V 2.79 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
665MH-132
22,312 kWh
700MH-132
23,486 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,174 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 665MH-132 700MH-132
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 665 W 700 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 636 W 670 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 607 W 639 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 578 W 609 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 665MH-132 700MH-132 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 665 Wp 700 Wp +35 W for 700MH-132
Module efficiency 21.40 % 22.53 % +1.13 pp for 700MH-132
Power density 214.1 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² +11.3 Wp/m² for 700MH-132
Open-circuit voltage 45.60 V 49.68 V 4.08 V apart
Voltage at max power 38.50 V 41.29 V 2.79 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.69 A 17.61 A 1.08 A apart
Current at max power 17.28 A 16.96 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x30 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.7 kg 34.0 kg -4.7 kg for 700MH-132
Weight per kWp 58.2 kg/kWp 48.6 kg/kWp -9.6 kg/kWp for 700MH-132
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for 665MH-132
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#8,388 vs #4,041
700MH-132 leads by 4,347 places
Power density
#8,315 vs #4,048
700MH-132 leads by 4,267 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,709 vs #2,360
700MH-132 leads by 9,349 places
Warranty
#21 vs #9,912
665MH-132 leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#2,299 vs #1,370
700MH-132 leads by 929 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-720MH-132
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-710MH-132
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-690MH-132
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-670MH-132
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-660MH-132
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 or Phono Solar NS-700MH-132?
According to our database: Phono Solar NS-700MH-132 has higher module efficiency (22.53% vs 21.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 and Phono Solar NS-700MH-132?
Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 has a module efficiency of 21.40%, while Phono Solar NS-700MH-132 is 22.53%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 use vs Phono Solar NS-700MH-132?
Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 uses TOPCon cells; Phono Solar NS-700MH-132 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 and Phono Solar NS-700MH-132?
Phono Solar NS-665MH-132 has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar NS-700MH-132 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 4 Phono Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.