Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar NS-720MH-132
VS
The verdict
PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 11 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 7 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
7 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW
NS-720MH-132
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight
37.9 kg
34.0 kg
3.9 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
52.6 kg/kWp
47.2 kg/kWp
5.4 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
HJT
N-type
HJT vs N-type
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW
24,157 kWh
NS-720MH-132
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW
NS-720MH-132
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
694 W
689 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
668 W
657 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
642 W
626 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW
NS-720MH-132
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
720 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
23.18 %
23.17 %
Effectively the same
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
Same
Open-circuit voltage
50.22 V
50.00 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
42.16 V
41.89 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.15 A
18.00 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.08 A
17.19 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
37.9 kg
34.0 kg
-3.9 kg for NS-720MH-132
Weight per kWp
52.6 kg/kWp
47.2 kg/kWp
-5.4 kg/kWp for NS-720MH-132
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW
Annual degradation
0.38 %/yr
-
Not published by Phono Solar
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
N-type
HJT vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,468
vs
#1,518
PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 50 places
Power density
#1,390
vs
#1,390
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#2,220
PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 2,207 places
Weight
#6,317
vs
#1,588
NS-720MH-132 leads by 4,729 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,912
PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#358
vs
#689
PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 331 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-710MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW or Phono Solar NS-720MH-132?
According to our database: Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 23.17%); Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar NS-720MH-132?
Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 is 23.17%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW use vs Phono Solar NS-720MH-132?
Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW uses HJT cells; Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar NS-720MH-132?
Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 bifacial panels?
Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 4 Phono Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.