Skip to main content
PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW vs PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW

Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW
PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW
715 Wp 23.02 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
725 Wp 23.34 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.32 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW Difference
Module efficiency 23.02 % 23.34 % 0.32 pp more efficient
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 715 Wp 725 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW
24,083 kWh
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
24,420 kWh
Lifetime gap
337 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 689 W 699 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 664 W 673 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 638 W 647 W
03

Full specification

Parameter PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 725 Wp +10 W for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Module efficiency 23.02 % 23.34 % +0.32 pp for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Open-circuit voltage 50.11 V 50.31 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.06 V 42.25 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.06 A 18.24 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.00 A 17.16 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.9 kg 37.9 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.0 kg/kWp 52.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.38 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#1,847 vs #981
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 866 places
Power density
#2,070 vs #974
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 1,096 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,802 vs #5,799
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 1,003 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#457 vs #255
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 202 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar NS-720MH-132
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
4 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW or Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW?
According to our database: Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 23.02%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW use vs Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW uses HJT cells; Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW bifacial panels?
Both Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Phono Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.