Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
VS
The verdict
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.63 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MS720N-HJTGB
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Difference
Module efficiency
23.17 %
24.80 %
1.63 pp more efficient
Rated power
720 Wp
795 Wp
75 W more power
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
247.5 Wp/m²
15.7 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
15 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
50.75 V
59.22 V
8.47 V apart
Module area
3.106 m²
3.212 m²
0.106 m² apart
Weight per kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
50.1 kg/kWp
3.8 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
HJT
Back Contact
HJT vs Back Contact
Voltage at max power
42.70 V
49.27 V
6.57 V apart
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Weight
38.8 kg
39.8 kg
1.0 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
17.67 A
16.99 A
0.68 A apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
Current at max power
16.87 A
16.14 A
0.73 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
MS720N-HJTGB
24,157 kWh
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
26,674 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,517 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
MS720N-HJTGB
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
795 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
692 W
764 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
664 W
733 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
636 W
702 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
MS720N-HJTGB
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
795 Wp
+75 W for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Module efficiency
23.17 %
24.80 %
+1.63 pp for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
247.5 Wp/m²
+15.7 Wp/m² for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Open-circuit voltage
50.75 V
59.22 V
8.47 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.70 V
49.27 V
6.57 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.67 A
16.99 A
0.68 A apart
Current at max power
16.87 A
16.14 A
0.73 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.212 m²
0.106 m² apart
Weight
38.8 kg
39.8 kg
-1.0 kg for MS720N-HJTGB
Weight per kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
50.1 kg/kWp
-3.8 kg/kWp for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
+15 yrs for MS720N-HJTGB
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.25 %/yr
-
Not published by AIKO
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
Back Contact
HJT vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,473
vs
#12
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 1,461 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#38
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 1,309 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,017
vs
#3,585
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 4,432 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#27
vs
#3
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 24 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS705N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS700N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB or AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 23.17%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB and AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw?
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB has a module efficiency of 23.17%, while AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB use vs AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw?
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB uses HJT cells; AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB and AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw?
Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB and AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw bifacial panels?
Both Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB and AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 174 AIKO offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
