Skip to main content
585HN4G vs 590HN4G 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G vs Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G

Mission Solar
MSI10-585HN4G
585 Wp 22.67 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Mission Solar
MSI10-590HN4G
590 Wp 22.86 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.298 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
585HN4G
19,628 kWh
590HN4G
19,796 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 585HN4G 590HN4G
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 585 W 590 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 559 W 564 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.1% of rated power 533 W 537 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.6% of rated power 507 W 511 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 585HN4G 590HN4G Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 585 Wp 590 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.67 % 22.86 % Effectively the same
Power density 226.5 Wp/m² 228.4 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 52.70 V 52.90 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 44.04 V 44.23 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.05 A 14.11 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.30 A 13.36 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.298 %/°C -0.298 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 32.2 kg 32.2 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.0 kg/kWp 54.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#3,563 vs #2,591
590HN4G leads by 972 places
Power density
#3,557 vs #2,653
590HN4G leads by 904 places
Heat behaviour
#6,149 vs #6,149
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,512 vs #9,021
590HN4G leads by 491 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,131 vs #3,768
590HN4G leads by 363 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G vs Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12670HP3G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12665HP3G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12660HP3G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12R620HN3G
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G or Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G?
According to our database: Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G has higher module efficiency (22.86% vs 22.67%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G and Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G?
Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G has a module efficiency of 22.67%, while Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G is 22.86%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G use vs Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G?
Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G uses TOPCon cells; Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G and Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G?
Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G has a 30 years power warranty; Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G and Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G bifacial panels?
Both Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G and Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Mission Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.