Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G
VS
The verdict
MST12R615HN3G leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 35 W more power. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
11 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MSI10-580HN4G
MST12R615HN3G
Difference
Rated power
580 Wp
615 Wp
35 W more power
Module efficiency
22.47 %
22.80 %
0.33 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage
52.50 V
48.29 V
4.21 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.99 A
16.20 A
2.21 A apart
Module area
2.583 m²
2.701 m²
0.118 m² apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Power density
224.5 Wp/m²
227.7 Wp/m²
3.2 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power
13.24 A
15.39 A
2.15 A apart
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
43.85 V
39.97 V
3.88 V apart
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MSI10-580HN4G
19,460 kWh
MST12R615HN3G
20,634 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,174 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
MSI10-580HN4G
MST12R615HN3G
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
580 W
615 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
554 W
588 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.1% of rated power
528 W
561 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.6% of rated power
502 W
535 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
MSI10-580HN4G
MST12R615HN3G
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
580 Wp
615 Wp
+35 W for MST12R615HN3G
Module efficiency
22.47 %
22.80 %
+0.33 pp for MST12R615HN3G
Power density
224.5 Wp/m²
227.7 Wp/m²
+3.2 Wp/m² for MST12R615HN3G
Open-circuit voltage
52.50 V
48.29 V
4.21 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.85 V
39.97 V
3.88 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.99 A
16.20 A
2.21 A apart
Current at max power
13.24 A
15.39 A
2.15 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.298 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Effectively the same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.701 m²
0.118 m² apart
Weight
32.2 kg
33.0 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
55.5 kg/kWp
53.7 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
-
Not published by Mission Solar
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,636
vs
#2,769
MST12R615HN3G leads by 1,867 places
Power density
#4,607
vs
#3,132
MST12R615HN3G leads by 1,475 places
Heat behaviour
#6,149
vs
#2,220
MST12R615HN3G leads by 3,929 places
Weight
#9,971
vs
#7,730
MST12R615HN3G leads by 2,241 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,578
vs
#5,428
MSI10-580HN4G leads by 850 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G vs Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G vs Mission Solar MSI10-585HN4G
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G vs Mission Solar MST12R620HN3G
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G vs Mission Solar MST12R610HN3G
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12670HP3G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12665HP3G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G or Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G?
According to our database: Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G has higher module efficiency (22.80% vs 22.47%); Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.298%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G and Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G?
Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G has a module efficiency of 22.47%, while Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G use vs Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G?
Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G uses TOPCon cells; Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G and Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G?
Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G has a 30 years power warranty; Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G and Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G bifacial panels?
Both Mission Solar MSI10-580HN4G and Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 Mission Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.