Skip to main content
MSE410HT0B vs MST12665HP3G 3 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Mission Solar MSE410HT0B vs Mission Solar MST12665HP3G

Mission Solar MSE410HT0B
Mission Solar
MSE410HT0B
410 Wp 21.00 % PERC
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Mission Solar
MST12665HP3G
665 Wp 21.40 % PERC Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

MST12665HP3G leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 255 W more power. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
3 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

15 of 18 parameters
Parameter MSE410HT0B MST12665HP3G Difference
Rated power 410 Wp 665 Wp 255 W more power
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Weight 19.0 kg 38.7 kg 19.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 46.3 kg/kWp 58.2 kg/kWp 11.9 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency 21.00 % 21.40 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.45 %/yr 0.10 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage 37.41 V 46.10 V 8.69 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.90 A 18.50 A 4.60 A apart
Module area 1.956 m² 3.106 m² 1.151 m² apart
Power density 209.7 Wp/m² 214.1 Wp/m² 4.4 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 31.38 V 38.30 V 6.92 V apart
Current at max power 13.07 A 17.39 A 4.32 A apart
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 1723x1135x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 1723x1135x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MSE410HT0B
13,288 kWh
MST12665HP3G
21,899 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,611 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario MSE410HT0B MST12665HP3G
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 410 W 665 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 389 W 631 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.7% of rated power 368 W 597 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.6% of rated power 347 W 563 W
03

Full specification

Parameter MSE410HT0B MST12665HP3G Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 410 Wp 665 Wp +255 W for MST12665HP3G
Module efficiency 21.00 % 21.40 % +0.40 pp for MST12665HP3G
Power density 209.7 Wp/m² 214.1 Wp/m² +4.4 Wp/m² for MST12665HP3G
Open-circuit voltage 37.41 V 46.10 V 8.69 V apart
Voltage at max power 31.38 V 38.30 V 6.92 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.90 A 18.50 A 4.60 A apart
Current at max power 13.07 A 17.39 A 4.32 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.343 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Effectively the same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1723x1135x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 1723x1135x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 1.956 m² 3.106 m² 1.151 m² apart
Weight 19.0 kg 38.7 kg -19.7 kg for MSE410HT0B
Weight per kWp 46.3 kg/kWp 58.2 kg/kWp -11.9 kg/kWp for MSE410HT0B
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs - Not published by Mission Solar
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for MST12665HP3G
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.45 %/yr -0.10 %/yr for MST12665HP3G
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#9,828 vs #8,388
MST12665HP3G leads by 1,440 places
Power density
#9,994 vs #8,315
MST12665HP3G leads by 1,679 places
Heat behaviour
#10,418 vs #8,846
MST12665HP3G leads by 1,572 places
Weight
#1,120 vs #11,709
MSE410HT0B leads by 10,589 places
Warranty
#9,912 vs #21
MST12665HP3G leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#10,147 vs #5,332
MST12665HP3G leads by 4,815 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSE410HT0B vs Mission Solar MSE405HT0B
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSE410HT0B vs Mission Solar MSE400HT0B
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12665HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12670HP3G
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12665HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12660HP3G
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSE410HT0B vs Mission Solar MST12R620HN3G
17 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSE410HT0B vs Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G
17 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Mission Solar MSE410HT0B or Mission Solar MST12665HP3G?
According to our database: Mission Solar MST12665HP3G has higher module efficiency (21.40% vs 21.00%); Mission Solar MST12665HP3G tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.343%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mission Solar MSE410HT0B and Mission Solar MST12665HP3G?
Mission Solar MSE410HT0B has a module efficiency of 21.00%, while Mission Solar MST12665HP3G is 21.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mission Solar MSE410HT0B use vs Mission Solar MST12665HP3G?
Mission Solar MSE410HT0B uses PERC cells; Mission Solar MST12665HP3G uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mission Solar MSE410HT0B and Mission Solar MST12665HP3G?
Mission Solar MSE410HT0B has a 25 years power warranty; Mission Solar MST12665HP3G has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mission Solar MSE410HT0B and Mission Solar MST12665HP3G bifacial panels?
Mission Solar MST12665HP3G is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Mission Solar MSE410HT0B is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Mission Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.