Skip to main content
MSE400HT0B vs MSE410HT0B 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Mission Solar MSE400HT0B vs Mission Solar MSE410HT0B

Mission Solar MSE400HT0B
Mission Solar
MSE400HT0B
400 Wp 20.50 % PERC
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Mission Solar MSE410HT0B
Mission Solar
MSE410HT0B
410 Wp 21.00 % PERC
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

MSE410HT0B leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter MSE400HT0B MSE410HT0B Difference
Module efficiency 20.50 % 21.00 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Power density 204.5 Wp/m² 209.7 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 400 Wp 410 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.343 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
MSE400HT0B
12,964 kWh
MSE410HT0B
13,288 kWh
Lifetime gap
324 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario MSE400HT0B MSE410HT0B
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 400 W 410 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 379 W 389 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.7% of rated power 359 W 368 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.6% of rated power 338 W 347 W
03

Full specification

Parameter MSE400HT0B MSE410HT0B Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 400 Wp 410 Wp +10 W for MSE410HT0B
Module efficiency 20.50 % 21.00 % +0.50 pp for MSE410HT0B
Power density 204.5 Wp/m² 209.7 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for MSE410HT0B
Open-circuit voltage 37.09 V 37.41 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 30.96 V 31.38 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.75 A 13.90 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.92 A 13.07 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.343 %/°C -0.343 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1723x1135x35 mm 1723x1135x35 mm Same
Module area 1.956 m² 1.956 m² Same
Weight 19.0 kg 19.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 47.5 kg/kWp 46.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.55 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#11,389 vs #9,828
MSE410HT0B leads by 1,561 places
Power density
#11,595 vs #9,994
MSE410HT0B leads by 1,601 places
Heat behaviour
#10,418 vs #10,418
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,726 vs #1,120
MSE410HT0B leads by 606 places
Warranty
#9,912 vs #9,912
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,705 vs #10,147
MSE410HT0B leads by 558 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSE400HT0B vs Mission Solar MSE405HT0B
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSE400HT0B vs Mission Solar MST12670HP3G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSE400HT0B vs Mission Solar MST12665HP3G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSE400HT0B vs Mission Solar MST12660HP3G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSE400HT0B vs Mission Solar MST12R620HN3G
17 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSE400HT0B vs Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G
17 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Mission Solar MSE400HT0B or Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?
According to our database: Mission Solar MSE410HT0B has higher module efficiency (21.00% vs 20.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mission Solar MSE400HT0B and Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?
Mission Solar MSE400HT0B has a module efficiency of 20.50%, while Mission Solar MSE410HT0B is 21.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mission Solar MSE400HT0B use vs Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?
Mission Solar MSE400HT0B uses PERC cells; Mission Solar MSE410HT0B uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mission Solar MSE400HT0B and Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?
Mission Solar MSE400HT0B has a 25 years power warranty; Mission Solar MSE410HT0B has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 4 Mission Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.