Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-425M/182-108+GG
Luxor Solar
LX-415M/182-108+GG
415 Wp
21.58 %
TOPCon
Bifacial
Incomplete
VS
Luxor Solar
LX-425M/182-108+GG
425 Wp
22.10 %
TOPCon
Bifacial
Incomplete
The verdict
425M/182-108+GG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.52 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
15
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
3 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
415M/182-108+GG
425M/182-108+GG
Difference
Module efficiency
21.58 %
22.10 %
0.52 pp more efficient
Power density
212.5 Wp/m²
217.6 Wp/m²
5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
415 Wp
425 Wp
10 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
415M/182-108+GG
13,924 kWh
425M/182-108+GG
14,260 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
415M/182-108+GG
425M/182-108+GG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
415 W
425 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
396 W
406 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
378 W
387 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
359 W
368 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
415M/182-108+GG
425M/182-108+GG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
415 Wp
425 Wp
+10 W for 425M/182-108+GG
Module efficiency
21.58 %
22.10 %
+0.52 pp for 425M/182-108+GG
Power density
212.5 Wp/m²
217.6 Wp/m²
+5.1 Wp/m² for 425M/182-108+GG
Open-circuit voltage
37.92 V
38.38 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
31.32 V
31.70 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
13.99 A
14.16 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.26 A
13.42 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.953 m²
1.953 m²
Same
Weight
21.5 kg
21.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
50.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,792
vs
#6,076
425M/182-108+GG leads by 1,716 places
Power density
#8,858
vs
#7,235
425M/182-108+GG leads by 1,623 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152
vs
#6,152
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,203
vs
#4,012
425M/182-108+GG leads by 1,191 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,538
vs
#6,501
425M/182-108+GG leads by 1,037 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-435M/182-108+GG
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-430M/182-108+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-420M/182-108+GG
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG or Luxor Solar LX-425M/182-108+GG?
According to our database: Luxor Solar LX-425M/182-108+GG has higher module efficiency (22.10% vs 21.58%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG and Luxor Solar LX-425M/182-108+GG?
Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG has a module efficiency of 21.58%, while Luxor Solar LX-425M/182-108+GG is 22.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG use vs Luxor Solar LX-425M/182-108+GG?
Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG uses TOPCon cells; Luxor Solar LX-425M/182-108+GG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG and Luxor Solar LX-425M/182-108+GG?
Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG has a 30 years power warranty; Luxor Solar LX-425M/182-108+GG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG and Luxor Solar LX-425M/182-108+GG bifacial panels?
Both Luxor Solar LX-415M/182-108+GG and Luxor Solar LX-425M/182-108+GG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 Luxor Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.