Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M vs Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M
VS
The verdict
LR8-66HYD-665M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 3.90 pp more efficient. 2 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 16 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
16 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LR8-66HYD-665M
LR5-54HIB-405M
Difference
Module efficiency
24.60 %
20.70 %
3.90 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
0.080 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
665 Wp
405 Wp
260 W more power
Power density
246.2 Wp/m²
207.4 Wp/m²
38.8 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight
33.5 kg
21.5 kg
12.0 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
50.02 V
37.15 V
12.87 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.78 A
13.78 A
3.00 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
1.953 m²
0.748 m² apart
Cell technology
Back Contact
PERC
Back Contact vs PERC
Weight per kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
53.1 kg/kWp
2.7 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
41.28 V
31.18 V
10.10 V apart
Current at max power
16.11 A
12.99 A
3.12 A apart
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LR8-66HYD-665M
22,312 kWh
LR5-54HIB-405M
13,589 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,723 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LR8-66HYD-665M
LR5-54HIB-405M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
665 W
405 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
639 W
384 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
613 W
364 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
587 W
343 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LR8-66HYD-665M
LR5-54HIB-405M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
665 Wp
405 Wp
+260 W for LR8-66HYD-665M
Module efficiency
24.60 %
20.70 %
+3.90 pp for LR8-66HYD-665M
Power density
246.2 Wp/m²
207.4 Wp/m²
+38.8 Wp/m² for LR8-66HYD-665M
Open-circuit voltage
50.02 V
37.15 V
12.87 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.28 V
31.18 V
10.10 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.78 A
13.78 A
3.00 A apart
Current at max power
16.11 A
12.99 A
3.12 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
+0.080 %/°C for LR8-66HYD-665M
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
1.953 m²
0.748 m² apart
Weight
33.5 kg
21.5 kg
-12.0 kg for LR5-54HIB-405M
Weight per kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
53.1 kg/kWp
-2.7 kg/kWp for LR8-66HYD-665M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for LR8-66HYD-665M
Annual degradation
-
0.55 %/yr
Not published by Longi Solar
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
PERC
Back Contact vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#58
vs
#10,842
LR8-66HYD-665M leads by 10,784 places
Power density
#47
vs
#10,702
LR8-66HYD-665M leads by 10,655 places
Heat behaviour
#515
vs
#8,846
LR8-66HYD-665M leads by 8,331 places
Weight
#3,759
vs
#6,908
LR8-66HYD-665M leads by 3,149 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,912
LR8-66HYD-665M leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#654
vs
#12,029
LR8-66HYD-665M leads by 11,375 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-660M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HYD-660M
7 differences, the largest is open-circuit voltage
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-655M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HYD-655M
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-650M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M or Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M has higher module efficiency (24.60% vs 20.70%); Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M and Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M?
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M has a module efficiency of 24.60%, while Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M is 20.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M use vs Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M?
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M uses Back Contact cells; Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M and Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M?
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M and Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M bifacial panels?
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR5-54HIB-405M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 156 Longi Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

