Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR5-72HGD-590M
VS
The verdict
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.00 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LR7-72HVHF-670M
LR5-72HGD-590M
Difference
Module efficiency
24.80 %
22.80 %
2.00 pp more efficient
Rated power
670 Wp
590 Wp
80 W more power
Power density
248.0 Wp/m²
228.4 Wp/m²
19.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp
42.5 kg/kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
11.4 kg/kWp lighter
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight
28.5 kg
31.8 kg
3.3 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Module area
2.701 m²
2.583 m²
0.118 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
54.30 V
51.63 V
2.67 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.60 A
14.38 A
1.22 A apart
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Current at max power
14.91 A
13.59 A
1.32 A apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power
44.96 V
43.44 V
1.52 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LR7-72HVHF-670M
22,655 kWh
LR5-72HGD-590M
19,796 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,859 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LR7-72HVHF-670M
LR5-72HGD-590M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
670 W
590 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
644 W
565 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
618 W
540 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
592 W
516 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LR7-72HVHF-670M
LR5-72HGD-590M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
670 Wp
590 Wp
+80 W for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Module efficiency
24.80 %
22.80 %
+2.00 pp for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Power density
248.0 Wp/m²
228.4 Wp/m²
+19.6 Wp/m² for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Open-circuit voltage
54.30 V
51.63 V
2.67 V apart
Voltage at max power
44.96 V
43.44 V
1.52 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.60 A
14.38 A
1.22 A apart
Current at max power
14.91 A
13.59 A
1.32 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
2.583 m²
0.118 m² apart
Weight
28.5 kg
31.8 kg
-3.3 kg for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Weight per kWp
42.5 kg/kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
-11.4 kg/kWp for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12
vs
#2,714
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 2,702 places
Power density
#14
vs
#2,598
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 2,584 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#1,309
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 798 places
Weight
#226
vs
#8,021
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 7,795 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#284
vs
#3,801
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 3,517 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-665M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-660M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-655M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-650M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-640M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M or Longi Solar LR5-72HGD-590M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 22.80%); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and Longi Solar LR5-72HGD-590M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while Longi Solar LR5-72HGD-590M is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M use vs Longi Solar LR5-72HGD-590M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M uses N-type cells; Longi Solar LR5-72HGD-590M uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and Longi Solar LR5-72HGD-590M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR5-72HGD-590M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and Longi Solar LR5-72HGD-590M bifacial panels?
Longi Solar LR5-72HGD-590M is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 174 Longi Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

