Skip to main content
LR7-54HJD-510M vs HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M vs Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)

Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M
LR7-54HJD-510M
510 Wp 25.00 % Back Contact Bifacial
VS
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
520 Wp 23.40 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

LR7-54HJD-510M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.60 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter LR7-54HJD-510M HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) Difference
Module efficiency 25.00 % 23.40 % 1.60 pp more efficient
Power density 249.9 Wp/m² 234.0 Wp/m² 15.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight 23.5 kg 27.1 kg 3.6 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 46.1 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 6.0 kg/kWp lighter
Module area 2.041 m² 2.223 m² 0.181 m² apart
Cell technology Back Contact HJT Back Contact vs HJT
Rated power 510 Wp 520 Wp 10 W more power
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.30 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Dimensions 1800x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
LR7-54HJD-510M
17,245 kWh
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
17,718 kWh
Lifetime gap
473 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario LR7-54HJD-510M HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 510 W 520 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 492 W 501 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 473 W 483 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 455 W 464 W
03

Full specification

Parameter LR7-54HJD-510M HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 510 Wp 520 Wp +10 W for HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Module efficiency 25.00 % 23.40 % +1.60 pp for LR7-54HJD-510M
Power density 249.9 Wp/m² 234.0 Wp/m² +15.9 Wp/m² for LR7-54HJD-510M
Open-circuit voltage 41.55 V 41.20 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 34.37 V 34.60 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.52 A 15.92 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.84 A 15.04 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1800x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.041 m² 2.223 m² 0.181 m² apart
Weight 23.5 kg 27.1 kg -3.6 kg for LR7-54HJD-510M
Weight per kWp 46.1 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp -6.0 kg/kWp for LR7-54HJD-510M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.30 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact HJT Back Contact vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4 vs #882
LR7-54HJD-510M leads by 878 places
Power density
#7 vs #898
LR7-54HJD-510M leads by 891 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#979 vs #5,593
LR7-54HJD-510M leads by 4,614 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,144 vs #1,953
LR7-54HJD-510M leads by 809 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-505M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M or Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M has higher module efficiency (25.00% vs 23.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M and Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M has a module efficiency of 25.00%, while Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) is 23.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M use vs Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M uses Back Contact cells; Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M and Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M has a 30 years power warranty; Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M and Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) bifacial panels?
Both Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M and Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Longi Solar and Hyundai as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 147 Longi Solar offers · See 38 Hyundai offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.