Skip to main content
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs LR7-54HJD-510M 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M

HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
520 Wp 23.40 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M
LR7-54HJD-510M
510 Wp 25.00 % Back Contact Bifacial
The verdict

LR7-54HJD-510M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.60 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) LR7-54HJD-510M Difference
Module efficiency 23.40 % 25.00 % 1.60 pp more efficient
Power density 234.0 Wp/m² 249.9 Wp/m² 15.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight 27.1 kg 23.5 kg 3.6 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 46.1 kg/kWp 6.0 kg/kWp lighter
Module area 2.223 m² 2.041 m² 0.181 m² apart
Cell technology HJT Back Contact HJT vs Back Contact
Rated power 520 Wp 510 Wp 10 W more power
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.35 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
17,718 kWh
LR7-54HJD-510M
17,245 kWh
Lifetime gap
473 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) LR7-54HJD-510M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 520 W 510 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 501 W 492 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 483 W 473 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 464 W 455 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) LR7-54HJD-510M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 520 Wp 510 Wp +10 W for HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Module efficiency 23.40 % 25.00 % +1.60 pp for LR7-54HJD-510M
Power density 234.0 Wp/m² 249.9 Wp/m² +15.9 Wp/m² for LR7-54HJD-510M
Open-circuit voltage 41.20 V 41.55 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 34.60 V 34.37 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.92 A 15.52 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.04 A 14.84 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.223 m² 2.041 m² 0.181 m² apart
Weight 27.1 kg 23.5 kg -3.6 kg for LR7-54HJD-510M
Weight per kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 46.1 kg/kWp -6.0 kg/kWp for LR7-54HJD-510M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.35 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Technology
Cell technology HJT Back Contact HJT vs Back Contact
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#882 vs #4
LR7-54HJD-510M leads by 878 places
Power density
#898 vs #7
LR7-54HJD-510M leads by 891 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,593 vs #979
LR7-54HJD-510M leads by 4,614 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,953 vs #1,144
LR7-54HJD-510M leads by 809 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-505M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) or Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M has higher module efficiency (25.00% vs 23.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) and Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M?
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) has a module efficiency of 23.40%, while Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M is 25.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) use vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M?
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) uses HJT cells; Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) and Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M?
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) and Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M bifacial panels?
Both Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) and Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Hyundai and Longi Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 38 Hyundai offers · See 147 Longi Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.