Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M
VS
The verdict
LR7-72HVDF-655M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 3.30 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LR5-72HBD-540M
LR7-72HVDF-655M
Difference
Module efficiency
20.90 %
24.20 %
3.30 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.080 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
540 Wp
655 Wp
115 W more power
Power density
209.0 Wp/m²
242.5 Wp/m²
33.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp
58.9 kg/kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
7.7 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
3 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.10 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage
49.50 V
54.32 V
4.82 V apart
Module area
2.583 m²
2.701 m²
0.118 m² apart
Short-circuit current
13.85 A
15.22 A
1.37 A apart
Weight
31.8 kg
33.5 kg
1.7 kg lighter
Voltage at max power
41.65 V
44.97 V
3.32 V apart
Current at max power
12.97 A
14.57 A
1.60 A apart
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LR5-72HBD-540M
17,783 kWh
LR7-72HVDF-655M
22,148 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,365 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LR5-72HBD-540M
LR7-72HVDF-655M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
540 W
655 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
512 W
629 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
485 W
604 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
457 W
578 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LR5-72HBD-540M
LR7-72HVDF-655M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
540 Wp
655 Wp
+115 W for LR7-72HVDF-655M
Module efficiency
20.90 %
24.20 %
+3.30 pp for LR7-72HVDF-655M
Power density
209.0 Wp/m²
242.5 Wp/m²
+33.4 Wp/m² for LR7-72HVDF-655M
Open-circuit voltage
49.50 V
54.32 V
4.82 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.65 V
44.97 V
3.32 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.85 A
15.22 A
1.37 A apart
Current at max power
12.97 A
14.57 A
1.60 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.080 %/°C for LR7-72HVDF-655M
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.701 m²
0.118 m² apart
Weight
31.8 kg
33.5 kg
-1.7 kg for LR5-72HBD-540M
Weight per kWp
58.9 kg/kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
-7.7 kg/kWp for LR7-72HVDF-655M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
+3 yrs for LR7-72HVDF-655M
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.10 %/yr for LR7-72HVDF-655M
Technology
Cell technology
-
N-type
Not published by Longi Solar
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#10,148
vs
#206
LR7-72HVDF-655M leads by 9,942 places
Power density
#10,176
vs
#192
LR7-72HVDF-655M leads by 9,984 places
Heat behaviour
#8,846
vs
#515
LR7-72HVDF-655M leads by 8,331 places
Weight
#12,026
vs
#4,527
LR7-72HVDF-655M leads by 7,499 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,953
vs
#759
LR7-72HVDF-655M leads by 7,194 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-655M
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HVD-655M
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVD-655M
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-655M
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HYD-655M
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-655M
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M or Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M has higher module efficiency (24.20% vs 20.90%); Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M and Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M?
Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M has a module efficiency of 20.90%, while Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M is 24.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M use vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M?
Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M uses Monocrystalline cells; Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M and Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M?
Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M and Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M bifacial panels?
Both Longi Solar LR5-72HBD-540M and Longi Solar LR7-72HVDF-655M are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 152 Longi Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

