Skip to main content
465W vs 495W 14 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W
Leapton
LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W
465 Wp 21.48 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W
Leapton
LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W
495 Wp 22.87 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

495W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.39 pp more efficient. 14 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
14 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

5 of 19 parameters
Parameter 465W 495W Difference
Module efficiency 21.48 % 22.87 % 1.39 pp more efficient
Power density 214.8 Wp/m² 228.7 Wp/m² 13.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 465 Wp 495 Wp 30 W more power
Weight per kWp 57.0 kg/kWp 52.5 kg/kWp 4.5 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power 13.33 A 13.83 A 0.50 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
465W
15,602 kWh
495W
16,608 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,006 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 465W 495W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 465 W 495 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 444 W 473 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 423 W 450 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 402 W 428 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 465W 495W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 465 Wp 495 Wp +30 W for 495W
Module efficiency 21.48 % 22.87 % +1.39 pp for 495W
Power density 214.8 Wp/m² 228.7 Wp/m² +13.9 Wp/m² for 495W
Open-circuit voltage 42.45 V 43.35 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 34.89 V 35.79 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.90 A 14.35 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.33 A 13.83 A 0.50 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1909x1134x30 mm 1909x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.165 m² 2.165 m² Same
Weight 26.5 kg 26.0 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 57.0 kg/kWp 52.5 kg/kWp -4.5 kg/kWp for 495W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 120 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#8,217 vs #2,585
495W leads by 5,632 places
Power density
#8,181 vs #2,510
495W leads by 5,671 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #6,152
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,074 vs #6,168
495W leads by 4,906 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,058 vs #4,313
495W leads by 2,745 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-500W
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-490W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-485W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-480W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-475W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-470W
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W or Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?
According to our database: Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W has higher module efficiency (22.87% vs 21.48%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465 W has a module efficiency of 21.48%, while Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W is 22.87%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W use vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465 W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W bifacial panels?
Both Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-465 W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 9 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.