HT108N-R3 455W vs HD108N-R2-500 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500

Q: Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W or Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?

According to our database: Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W has higher module efficiency (22.80% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W has a module efficiency of 22.80%, while Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W use vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 bifacial panels?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Jolywood

JW-HT108N-R3 455W

455 Wp 22.80 % TOPCon

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Jolywood

JW-HD108N-R2-500

500 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

10 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 45 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences

How alike are they

9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters

Parameter HT108N-R3 455W HD108N-R2-500 Difference

Rated power 455 Wp 500 Wp 45 W more power

Weight 21.7 kg 27.3 kg 5.6 kg lighter

Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs 13 yrs longer

Weight per kWp 47.7 kg/kWp 54.6 kg/kWp 6.9 kg/kWp lighter

Module area 1.998 m² 2.223 m² 0.225 m² apart

Module efficiency 22.80 % 22.50 % 0.30 pp more efficient

Short-circuit current 14.28 A 15.78 A 1.50 A apart

Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes

Current at max power 13.51 A 14.92 A 1.41 A apart

Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

HT108N-R3 455W

15,266 kWh

HD108N-R2-500

16,776 kWh

Lifetime gap

1,510 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario HT108N-R3 455W HD108N-R2-500

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 455 W 500 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 436 W 479 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 417 W 458 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 398 W 437 W

Full specification

Parameter HT108N-R3 455W HD108N-R2-500 Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 455 Wp 500 Wp +45 W for HD108N-R2-500

Module efficiency 22.80 % 22.50 % +0.30 pp for HT108N-R3 455W

Power density 227.7 Wp/m² 225.0 Wp/m² Effectively the same

Open-circuit voltage 39.17 V 39.03 V Effectively the same

Voltage at max power 33.67 V 33.50 V Effectively the same

Short-circuit current 14.28 A 15.78 A 1.50 A apart

Current at max power 13.51 A 14.92 A 1.41 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm

Module area 1.998 m² 2.223 m² 0.225 m² apart

Weight 21.7 kg 27.3 kg -5.6 kg for HT108N-R3 455W

Weight per kWp 47.7 kg/kWp 54.6 kg/kWp -6.9 kg/kWp for HT108N-R3 455W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs +13 yrs for HD108N-R2-500

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 108 108 Same

Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes

Against the whole database

14,129 panels

Efficiency

#2,769 vs #4,281

HT108N-R3 455W leads by 1,512 places

Power density

#2,943 vs #4,510

HT108N-R3 455W leads by 1,567 places

Heat behaviour

#1,347 vs #1,347

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#1,812 vs #9,031

HT108N-R3 455W leads by 7,219 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#8,558 vs #4,618

HD108N-R2-500 leads by 3,940 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525

11 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520

11 differences, the largest is rated power

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-515

11 differences, the largest is rated power

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510

9 differences, the largest is rated power

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-505

9 differences, the largest is rated power

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-460

4 differences, the largest is weight

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W or Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?

According to our database: Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455 W has higher module efficiency (22.80% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455 W has a module efficiency of 22.80%, while Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W use vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455 W uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500?

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455 W has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 bifacial panels?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 28 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.