Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-440
VS
The verdict
HD132N-715 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 275 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
HD132N-715
HD108N-440
Difference
Rated power
715 Wp
440 Wp
275 W more power
Weight
38.1 kg
24.5 kg
13.6 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
13 yrs longer
Module efficiency
23.00 %
22.53 %
0.47 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
48.14 V
38.60 V
9.54 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.28 A
14.25 A
4.03 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
1.953 m²
1.154 m² apart
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
225.3 Wp/m²
4.9 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power
41.32 V
32.70 V
8.62 V apart
Current at max power
17.30 A
13.46 A
3.84 A apart
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Weight per kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
55.7 kg/kWp
2.4 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HD132N-715
23,990 kWh
HD108N-440
14,763 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,227 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
HD132N-715
HD108N-440
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
440 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
685 W
420 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
655 W
400 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
625 W
381 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
HD132N-715
HD108N-440
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
440 Wp
+275 W for HD132N-715
Module efficiency
23.00 %
22.53 %
+0.47 pp for HD132N-715
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
225.3 Wp/m²
+4.9 Wp/m² for HD132N-715
Open-circuit voltage
48.14 V
38.60 V
9.54 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.32 V
32.70 V
8.62 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.28 A
14.25 A
4.03 A apart
Current at max power
17.30 A
13.46 A
3.84 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for HD132N-715
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
1.953 m²
1.154 m² apart
Weight
38.1 kg
24.5 kg
-13.6 kg for HD108N-440
Weight per kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
55.7 kg/kWp
-2.4 kg/kWp for HD132N-715
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
+13 yrs for HD108N-440
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,970
vs
#4,041
HD132N-715 leads by 2,071 places
Power density
#2,070
vs
#4,158
HD132N-715 leads by 2,088 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347
vs
#6,152
HD132N-715 leads by 4,805 places
Weight
#7,237
vs
#10,132
HD132N-715 leads by 2,895 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#691
vs
#6,647
HD132N-715 leads by 5,956 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-700
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 or Jolywood JW-HD108N-440?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.53%); Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-440?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Jolywood JW-HD108N-440 is 22.53%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 use vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-440?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD108N-440 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-440?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD108N-440 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-440 bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-440 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 24 Jolywood offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.