Skip to main content
HD108N-R3-455 vs HT108N-R3 460W 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460W

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455
Jolywood
JW-HD108N-R3-455
455 Wp 22.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460W
Jolywood
JW-HT108N-R3 460W
460 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

HT108N-R3 460W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is weight per kwp: 6.9 kg/kWp lighter. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter HD108N-R3-455 HT108N-R3 460W Difference
Weight per kWp 54.1 kg/kWp 47.2 kg/kWp 6.9 kg/kWp lighter
Weight 24.6 kg 21.7 kg 2.9 kg lighter
Module efficiency 22.80 % 23.00 % 0.20 pp more efficient
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
HD108N-R3-455
15,266 kWh
HT108N-R3 460W
15,434 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HD108N-R3-455 HT108N-R3 460W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 455 W 460 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 436 W 441 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 417 W 421 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 398 W 402 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HD108N-R3-455 HT108N-R3 460W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 455 Wp 460 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.80 % 23.00 % +0.20 pp for HT108N-R3 460W
Power density 227.7 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 39.37 V 39.37 V Same
Voltage at max power 33.87 V 33.85 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.21 A 14.35 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.43 A 13.59 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 24.6 kg 21.7 kg -2.9 kg for HT108N-R3 460W
Weight per kWp 54.1 kg/kWp 47.2 kg/kWp -6.9 kg/kWp for HT108N-R3 460W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#2,769 vs #1,970
HT108N-R3 460W leads by 799 places
Power density
#2,943 vs #1,927
HT108N-R3 460W leads by 1,016 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347 vs #1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,366 vs #1,533
HT108N-R3 460W leads by 6,833 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,683 vs #8,097
HT108N-R3 460W leads by 586 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-460
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W
3 differences, the largest is weight per kwp
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 450W
4 differences, the largest is weight per kwp
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-450
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 or Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460W?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460W?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 has a module efficiency of 22.80%, while Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460 W is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 use vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460W?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460W?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460W bifacial panels?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 28 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.