Skip to main content
HD108N-R3-445 vs HT108N-R3 455W 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445
Jolywood
JW-HD108N-R3-445
445 Wp 22.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W
Jolywood
JW-HT108N-R3 455W
455 Wp 22.80 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

HT108N-R3 455W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter HD108N-R3-445 HT108N-R3 455W Difference
Module efficiency 22.30 % 22.80 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp 55.3 kg/kWp 47.7 kg/kWp 7.6 kg/kWp lighter
Weight 24.6 kg 21.7 kg 2.9 kg lighter
Power density 222.7 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² 5.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 445 Wp 455 Wp 10 W more power
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
HD108N-R3-445
14,931 kWh
HT108N-R3 455W
15,266 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HD108N-R3-445 HT108N-R3 455W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 445 W 455 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 426 W 436 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 408 W 417 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 389 W 398 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HD108N-R3-445 HT108N-R3 455W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 445 Wp 455 Wp +10 W for HT108N-R3 455W
Module efficiency 22.30 % 22.80 % +0.50 pp for HT108N-R3 455W
Power density 222.7 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² +5.0 Wp/m² for HT108N-R3 455W
Open-circuit voltage 38.97 V 39.17 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.51 V 33.67 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.07 A 14.28 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.28 A 13.51 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 24.6 kg 21.7 kg -2.9 kg for HT108N-R3 455W
Weight per kWp 55.3 kg/kWp 47.7 kg/kWp -7.6 kg/kWp for HT108N-R3 455W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,161 vs #2,769
HT108N-R3 455W leads by 2,392 places
Power density
#5,365 vs #2,943
HT108N-R3 455W leads by 2,422 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347 vs #1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,800 vs #1,812
HT108N-R3 455W leads by 7,988 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,518 vs #8,558
HT108N-R3 455W leads by 960 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-460
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 460W
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-455
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 450W
4 differences, the largest is weight per kwp
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-450
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W
3 differences, the largest is weight per kwp
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 or Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455 W has higher module efficiency (22.80% vs 22.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 has a module efficiency of 22.30%, while Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455 W is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 use vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455W bifacial panels?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-445 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 455 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 28 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.