HD108N-R2-500 vs HT108N-R3 445W 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W

Q: Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 or Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W?

According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 22.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W is 22.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 use vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W bifacial panels?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Jolywood

JW-HD108N-R2-500

500 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Jolywood

JW-HT108N-R3 445W

445 Wp 22.30 % TOPCon

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

HD108N-R2-500 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 55 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences

How alike are they

9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters

Parameter HD108N-R2-500 HT108N-R3 445W Difference

Rated power 500 Wp 445 Wp 55 W more power

Weight 27.3 kg 21.7 kg 5.6 kg lighter

Product warranty 25 yrs 12 yrs 13 yrs longer

Weight per kWp 54.6 kg/kWp 48.8 kg/kWp 5.8 kg/kWp lighter

Module area 2.223 m² 1.998 m² 0.225 m² apart

Short-circuit current 15.78 A 14.14 A 1.64 A apart

Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.30 % 0.20 pp more efficient

Current at max power 14.92 A 13.36 A 1.56 A apart

Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No

Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

HD108N-R2-500

16,776 kWh

HT108N-R3 445W

14,931 kWh

Lifetime gap

1,845 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario HD108N-R2-500 HT108N-R3 445W

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 500 W 445 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 479 W 426 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 458 W 408 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 437 W 389 W

Full specification

Parameter HD108N-R2-500 HT108N-R3 445W Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 500 Wp 445 Wp +55 W for HD108N-R2-500

Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.30 % +0.20 pp for HD108N-R2-500

Power density 225.0 Wp/m² 222.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same

Open-circuit voltage 39.03 V 38.77 V Effectively the same

Voltage at max power 33.50 V 33.31 V Effectively the same

Short-circuit current 15.78 A 14.14 A 1.64 A apart

Current at max power 14.92 A 13.36 A 1.56 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm

Module area 2.223 m² 1.998 m² 0.225 m² apart

Weight 27.3 kg 21.7 kg -5.6 kg for HT108N-R3 445W

Weight per kWp 54.6 kg/kWp 48.8 kg/kWp -5.8 kg/kWp for HT108N-R3 445W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 25 yrs 12 yrs +13 yrs for HD108N-R2-500

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 108 108 Same

Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No

Against the whole database

14,129 panels

Efficiency

#4,281 vs #5,161

HD108N-R2-500 leads by 880 places

Power density

#4,510 vs #5,365

HD108N-R2-500 leads by 855 places

Heat behaviour

#1,347 vs #1,347

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#9,031 vs #2,456

HT108N-R3 445W leads by 6,575 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#4,618 vs #9,437

HD108N-R2-500 leads by 4,819 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525

5 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520

4 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-515

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-505

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R3-460

6 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 or Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W?

According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 22.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445 W is 22.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 use vs Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445W bifacial panels?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jolywood JW-HT108N-R3 445 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 28 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.