JKM595N-72HL4-(V) vs JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant) 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)

Q: Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) or Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?

According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) has higher module efficiency (23.03% vs 22.72%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) and Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) has a module efficiency of 23.03%, while Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant) is 22.72%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) use vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant) uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) and Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

JKM595N-72HL4-(V)

595 Wp 23.03 % TOPCon

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)

635 Wp 22.72 % N-type

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

10 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 40 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences

How alike are they

9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters

Parameter JKM595N-72HL4-(V) JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant) Difference

Rated power 595 Wp 635 Wp 40 W more power

Open-circuit voltage 52.79 V 56.85 V 4.06 V apart

Module area 2.583 m² 2.795 m² 0.212 m² apart

Module efficiency 23.03 % 22.72 % 0.31 pp more efficient

Weight 27.0 kg 29.5 kg 2.5 kg lighter

Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type

Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 227.2 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher

Cell count 144 156 12 cells apart

Voltage at max power 43.88 V 47.46 V 3.58 V apart

Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1134x35 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

JKM595N-72HL4-(V)

19,963 kWh

JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)

21,306 kWh

Lifetime gap

1,343 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario JKM595N-72HL4-(V) JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 595 W 635 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 569 W 607 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 543 W 580 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 517 W 552 W

Full specification

Parameter JKM595N-72HL4-(V) JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant) Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 595 Wp 635 Wp +40 W for JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)

Module efficiency 23.03 % 22.72 % +0.31 pp for JKM595N-72HL4-(V)

Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 227.2 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for JKM595N-72HL4-(V)

Open-circuit voltage 52.79 V 56.85 V 4.06 V apart

Voltage at max power 43.88 V 47.46 V 3.58 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.19 A 14.04 A Effectively the same

Current at max power 13.56 A 13.38 A Effectively the same

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1134x35 mm

Module area 2.583 m² 2.795 m² 0.212 m² apart

Weight 27.0 kg 29.5 kg -2.5 kg for JKM595N-72HL4-(V)

Weight per kWp 45.4 kg/kWp 46.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 144 156 12 cells apart

Bifacial No No Same

Against the whole database

14,129 panels

Efficiency

#1,794 vs #3,302

JKM595N-72HL4-(V) leads by 1,508 places

Power density

#1,809 vs #3,309

JKM595N-72HL4-(V) leads by 1,500 places

Heat behaviour

#2,220 vs #2,220

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#708 vs #1,173

JKM595N-72HL4-(V) leads by 465 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#3,254 vs #2,276

JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant) leads by 978 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (630W variant)

10 differences, the largest is rated power

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (625W variant)

10 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant)

11 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant)

11 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM605N-72HL4-(V)

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM600N-72HL4-(V)

One difference: module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) or Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?

According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) has higher module efficiency (23.03% vs 22.72%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) and Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) has a module efficiency of 23.03%, while Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635 W variant) is 22.72%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) use vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635 W variant) uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) and Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?

Jinko Solar JKM595N-72HL4-(V) has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635 W variant) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 139 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.