Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
VS
The verdict
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.04 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Difference
Module efficiency
22.48 %
23.52 %
1.04 pp more efficient
Power density
224.8 Wp/m²
235.2 Wp/m²
10.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
500 Wp
470 Wp
30 W more power
Weight
27.0 kg
24.0 kg
3.0 kg lighter
Module area
2.224 m²
1.998 m²
0.226 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
40.38 V
36.87 V
3.51 V apart
Weight per kWp
54.0 kg/kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
2.9 kg/kWp lighter
Cell count
108
96
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
33.95 V
31.46 V
2.49 V apart
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
16,776 kWh
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
15,769 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,007 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
500 W
470 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
478 W
450 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
457 W
429 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
435 W
409 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
500 Wp
470 Wp
+30 W for JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
Module efficiency
22.48 %
23.52 %
+1.04 pp for JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Power density
224.8 Wp/m²
235.2 Wp/m²
+10.4 Wp/m² for JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Open-circuit voltage
40.38 V
36.87 V
3.51 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.95 V
31.46 V
2.49 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.63 A
15.85 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
14.73 A
14.94 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.224 m²
1.998 m²
0.226 m² apart
Weight
27.0 kg
24.0 kg
-3.0 kg for JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Weight per kWp
54.0 kg/kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
-2.9 kg/kWp for JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
96
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,565
vs
#678
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads by 3,887 places
Power density
#4,468
vs
#674
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads by 3,794 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,183
vs
#4,393
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads by 3,790 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,659
vs
#6,415
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads by 244 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM515-54HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM510-54HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM505-54HL4M-BDV
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV or Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU has higher module efficiency (23.52% vs 22.48%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV has a module efficiency of 22.48%, while Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU is 23.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV use vs Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

