Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B
VS
The verdict
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.99 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
JKM425N-54HL4R-B
Difference
Module efficiency
22.26 %
21.27 %
0.99 pp more efficient
Rated power
495 Wp
425 Wp
70 W more power
Power density
222.6 Wp/m²
212.7 Wp/m²
9.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight
27.0 kg
22.0 kg
5.0 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
25 yrs
10 yrs longer
Short-circuit current
15.58 A
13.58 A
2.00 A apart
Module area
2.224 m²
1.998 m²
0.226 m² apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Weight per kWp
54.5 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
2.8 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power
14.68 A
13.13 A
1.55 A apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Open-circuit voltage
40.21 V
38.95 V
1.26 V apart
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power
33.72 V
32.37 V
1.35 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
16,608 kWh
JKM425N-54HL4R-B
14,260 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,348 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
JKM425N-54HL4R-B
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
495 W
425 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
473 W
407 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
452 W
388 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
430 W
370 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
JKM425N-54HL4R-B
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
495 Wp
425 Wp
+70 W for JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
Module efficiency
22.26 %
21.27 %
+0.99 pp for JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
Power density
222.6 Wp/m²
212.7 Wp/m²
+9.9 Wp/m² for JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
Open-circuit voltage
40.21 V
38.95 V
1.26 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.72 V
32.37 V
1.35 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.58 A
13.58 A
2.00 A apart
Current at max power
14.68 A
13.13 A
1.55 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.224 m²
1.998 m²
0.226 m² apart
Weight
27.0 kg
22.0 kg
-5.0 kg for JKM425N-54HL4R-B
Weight per kWp
54.5 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
-2.8 kg/kWp for JKM425N-54HL4R-B
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
25 yrs
+10 yrs for JKM425N-54HL4R-B
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,656
vs
#8,918
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV leads by 3,262 places
Power density
#5,584
vs
#8,800
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV leads by 3,216 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,953
vs
#5,163
JKM425N-54HL4R-B leads by 3,790 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,191
vs
#8,718
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV leads by 1,527 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM515-54HL4M-BDV
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM510-54HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM505-54HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV or Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV has higher module efficiency (22.26% vs 21.27%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B?
Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV has a module efficiency of 22.26%, while Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B is 21.27%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV use vs Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B?
Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B?
Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B bifacial panels?
Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 132 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
