Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
VS
The verdict
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.79 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
Difference
Module efficiency
23.27 %
22.48 %
0.79 pp more efficient
Rated power
465 Wp
500 Wp
35 W more power
Power density
232.7 Wp/m²
224.8 Wp/m²
7.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight
24.0 kg
27.0 kg
3.0 kg lighter
Module area
1.998 m²
2.224 m²
0.226 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
36.70 V
40.38 V
3.68 V apart
Cell count
96
108
12 cells apart
Weight per kWp
51.6 kg/kWp
54.0 kg/kWp
2.4 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
31.23 V
33.95 V
2.72 V apart
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
15,602 kWh
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
16,776 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,174 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
465 W
500 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
445 W
478 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
425 W
457 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
404 W
435 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
465 Wp
500 Wp
+35 W for JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
Module efficiency
23.27 %
22.48 %
+0.79 pp for JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Power density
232.7 Wp/m²
224.8 Wp/m²
+7.9 Wp/m² for JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Open-circuit voltage
36.70 V
40.38 V
3.68 V apart
Voltage at max power
31.23 V
33.95 V
2.72 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.80 A
15.63 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
14.89 A
14.73 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
2.224 m²
0.226 m² apart
Weight
24.0 kg
27.0 kg
-3.0 kg for JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Weight per kWp
51.6 kg/kWp
54.0 kg/kWp
-2.4 kg/kWp for JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
96
108
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,202
vs
#4,565
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads by 3,363 places
Power density
#1,115
vs
#4,468
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads by 3,353 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,981
vs
#8,183
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads by 3,202 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,892
vs
#6,659
JKM500-54HL4M-BDV leads by 233 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM515-54HL4M-BDV
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM510-54HL4M-BDV
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM505-54HL4M-BDV
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU or Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU has higher module efficiency (23.27% vs 22.48%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU and Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU has a module efficiency of 23.27%, while Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV is 22.48%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU use vs Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU and Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU and Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU and Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 162 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

