Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
VS
The verdict
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.56 pp more efficient. 6 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
11 of 17 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JS210MHC132-655
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
Difference
Module efficiency
21.10 %
23.66 %
2.56 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
655 Wp
735 Wp
80 W more power
Power density
210.9 Wp/m²
236.6 Wp/m²
25.8 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight
34.0 kg
37.5 kg
3.5 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
45.50 V
49.52 V
4.02 V apart
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power
37.61 V
41.23 V
3.62 V apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JS210MHC132-655
21,741 kWh
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
24,661 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,920 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JS210MHC132-655
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
655 W
735 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
622 W
703 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
588 W
671 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
555 W
639 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JS210MHC132-655
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
655 Wp
735 Wp
+80 W for JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
Module efficiency
21.10 %
23.66 %
+2.56 pp for JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
Power density
210.9 Wp/m²
236.6 Wp/m²
+25.8 Wp/m² for JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
Open-circuit voltage
45.50 V
49.52 V
4.02 V apart
Voltage at max power
37.61 V
41.23 V
3.62 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.48 A
18.88 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.42 A
17.83 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
34.0 kg
37.5 kg
-3.5 kg for JS210MHC132-655
Weight per kWp
51.9 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
-
12 yrs
Not published by Jinko Solar
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by Jinko Solar
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#9,297
vs
#602
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU leads by 8,695 places
Power density
#9,459
vs
#582
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU leads by 8,877 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#2,165
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU leads by 6,613 places
Weight
#5,320
vs
#4,360
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU leads by 960 places
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#21
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#6,977
vs
#239
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU leads by 6,738 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-650
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 or Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 21.10%); Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 and Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 has a module efficiency of 21.10%, while Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU is 23.66%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 use vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 and Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 and Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU bifacial panels?
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
