Skip to main content
JS182MHC144-535 vs JS182MHC120-465 7 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465

JS182MHC144-535
535 Wp 20.70 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JS182MHC120-465
465 Wp 21.48 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

JS182MHC120-465 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.78 pp more efficient. 7 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
7 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 17 parameters
Parameter JS182MHC144-535 JS182MHC120-465 Difference
Module efficiency 20.70 % 21.48 % 0.78 pp more efficient
Rated power 535 Wp 465 Wp 70 W more power
Weight 26.5 kg 23.0 kg 3.5 kg lighter
Power density 207.0 Wp/m² 214.8 Wp/m² 7.8 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage 49.40 V 42.00 V 7.40 V apart
Module area 2.584 m² 2.165 m² 0.420 m² apart
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Voltage at max power 41.40 V 35.40 V 6.00 V apart
Cell count 144 120 24 cells apart
Dimensions 2279x1134x35 mm 1909x1134x30 mm 2279x1134x35 mm vs 1909x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JS182MHC144-535
17,950 kWh
JS182MHC120-465
15,602 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,348 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JS182MHC144-535 JS182MHC120-465
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 535 W 465 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 507 W 441 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 479 W 418 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 451 W 394 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JS182MHC144-535 JS182MHC120-465 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 535 Wp 465 Wp +70 W for JS182MHC144-535
Module efficiency 20.70 % 21.48 % +0.78 pp for JS182MHC120-465
Power density 207.0 Wp/m² 214.8 Wp/m² +7.8 Wp/m² for JS182MHC120-465
Open-circuit voltage 49.40 V 42.00 V 7.40 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.40 V 35.40 V 6.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.71 A 13.83 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.92 A 13.14 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for JS182MHC120-465
Mechanical
Dimensions 2279x1134x35 mm 1909x1134x30 mm 2279x1134x35 mm vs 1909x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.584 m² 2.165 m² 0.420 m² apart
Weight 26.5 kg 23.0 kg -3.5 kg for JS182MHC120-465
Weight per kWp 49.5 kg/kWp 49.5 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 120 24 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#10,764 vs #8,152
JS182MHC120-465 leads by 2,612 places
Power density
#10,849 vs #8,116
JS182MHC120-465 leads by 2,733 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #8,778
JS182MHC120-465 leads by 1,641 places
Weight
#3,074 vs #2,991
JS182MHC120-465 leads by 83 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,883 vs #11,710
JS182MHC144-535 leads by 827 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-545
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-530
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 or Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 has higher module efficiency (21.48% vs 20.70%); Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 has a module efficiency of 20.70%, while Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 is 21.48%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 use vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 170 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.