Skip to main content
JS182MHC120-465 vs JS182MHC132-510 10 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510

JS182MHC120-465
465 Wp 21.48 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JS182MHC132-510
510 Wp 21.47 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

JS182MHC132-510 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 45 W more power. 10 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
10 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

7 of 17 parameters
Parameter JS182MHC120-465 JS182MHC132-510 Difference
Rated power 465 Wp 510 Wp 45 W more power
Weight 23.0 kg 26.0 kg 3.0 kg lighter
Module area 2.165 m² 2.375 m² 0.210 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 42.00 V 45.60 V 3.60 V apart
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 35.40 V 38.40 V 3.00 V apart
Dimensions 1909x1134x30 mm 2094x1134x30 mm 1909x1134x30 mm vs 2094x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JS182MHC120-465
15,434 kWh
JS182MHC132-510
16,928 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,494 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JS182MHC120-465 JS182MHC132-510
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 465 W 510 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 441 W 484 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 418 W 458 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 394 W 432 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JS182MHC120-465 JS182MHC132-510 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 465 Wp 510 Wp +45 W for JS182MHC132-510
Module efficiency 21.48 % 21.47 % Effectively the same
Power density 214.8 Wp/m² 214.8 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 42.00 V 45.60 V 3.60 V apart
Voltage at max power 35.40 V 38.40 V 3.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.83 A 13.94 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.14 A 13.39 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1909x1134x30 mm 2094x1134x30 mm 1909x1134x30 mm vs 2094x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.165 m² 2.375 m² 0.210 m² apart
Weight 23.0 kg 26.0 kg -3.0 kg for JS182MHC120-465
Weight per kWp 49.5 kg/kWp 51.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#8,152 vs #8,240
JS182MHC120-465 leads by 88 places
Power density
#8,116 vs #8,130
JS182MHC120-465 leads by 14 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,991 vs #4,341
JS182MHC120-465 leads by 1,350 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#11,710 vs #10,867
JS182MHC132-510 leads by 843 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-545
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-530
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 or Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 has higher module efficiency (21.48% vs 21.47%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 has a module efficiency of 21.48%, while Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 is 21.47%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 use vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC120-465 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 170 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.