Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV vs AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
VS
The verdict
AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV
AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
23.69 %
24.20 %
0.51 pp more efficient
Weight
32.4 kg
29.0 kg
3.4 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
50.6 kg/kWp
44.3 kg/kWp
6.4 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
49.88 V
54.50 V
4.62 V apart
Power density
236.9 Wp/m²
242.5 Wp/m²
5.6 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
640 Wp
655 Wp
15 W more power
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Short-circuit current
16.32 A
15.18 A
1.14 A apart
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
41.30 V
45.20 V
3.90 V apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Current at max power
15.50 A
14.50 A
1.00 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV
21,473 kWh
AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
22,148 kWh
Lifetime gap
675 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV
AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
640 W
655 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
612 W
629 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
584 W
604 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
556 W
578 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV
AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
640 Wp
655 Wp
+15 W for AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
Module efficiency
23.69 %
24.20 %
+0.51 pp for AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
Power density
236.9 Wp/m²
242.5 Wp/m²
+5.6 Wp/m² for AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
Open-circuit voltage
49.88 V
54.50 V
4.62 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.30 V
45.20 V
3.90 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.32 A
15.18 A
1.14 A apart
Current at max power
15.50 A
14.50 A
1.00 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.701 m²
2.701 m²
Same
Weight
32.4 kg
29.0 kg
-3.4 kg for AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
Weight per kWp
50.6 kg/kWp
44.3 kg/kWp
-6.4 kg/kWp for AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
+3 yrs for AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#612
vs
#206
AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw leads by 406 places
Power density
#553
vs
#192
AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw leads by 361 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#515
AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw leads by 1,705 places
Weight
#4,091
vs
#415
AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw leads by 3,676 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,545
vs
#676
AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw leads by 869 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM630N-66HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM625N-66HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM620N-66HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM615N-66HL4M-BDV
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A680-MDE72Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV or AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw has higher module efficiency (24.20% vs 23.69%); AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV and AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw?
Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV has a module efficiency of 23.69%, while AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw is 24.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV use vs AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw?
Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV uses N-type cells; AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV and AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw?
Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV and AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw bifacial panels?
Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 139 Jinko Solar offers · See 131 AIKO offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

