Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B vs Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
VS
The verdict
JKM520-54HL4M-BDV leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.11 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM425N-54HL4R-B
JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
Difference
Module efficiency
21.27 %
23.38 %
2.11 pp more efficient
Rated power
425 Wp
520 Wp
95 W more power
Power density
212.7 Wp/m²
233.8 Wp/m²
21.1 Wp/m² higher
Weight
22.0 kg
27.0 kg
5.0 kg lighter
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
10 yrs longer
Short-circuit current
13.58 A
15.83 A
2.25 A apart
Module area
1.998 m²
2.224 m²
0.226 m² apart
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Open-circuit voltage
38.95 V
41.06 V
2.11 V apart
Current at max power
13.13 A
14.93 A
1.80 A apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Voltage at max power
32.37 V
34.83 V
2.46 V apart
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM425N-54HL4R-B
14,260 kWh
JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
17,447 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,187 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM425N-54HL4R-B
JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
425 W
520 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
407 W
497 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
388 W
475 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
370 W
452 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM425N-54HL4R-B
JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
425 Wp
520 Wp
+95 W for JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
Module efficiency
21.27 %
23.38 %
+2.11 pp for JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
Power density
212.7 Wp/m²
233.8 Wp/m²
+21.1 Wp/m² for JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
Open-circuit voltage
38.95 V
41.06 V
2.11 V apart
Voltage at max power
32.37 V
34.83 V
2.46 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.58 A
15.83 A
2.25 A apart
Current at max power
13.13 A
14.93 A
1.80 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
2.224 m²
0.226 m² apart
Weight
22.0 kg
27.0 kg
-5.0 kg for JKM425N-54HL4R-B
Weight per kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
51.9 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
+10 yrs for JKM425N-54HL4R-B
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#8,918
vs
#965
JKM520-54HL4M-BDV leads by 7,953 places
Power density
#8,800
vs
#947
JKM520-54HL4M-BDV leads by 7,853 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,163
vs
#5,374
JKM425N-54HL4R-B leads by 211 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,718
vs
#4,911
JKM520-54HL4M-BDV leads by 3,807 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B vs Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B vs Jinko Solar JKM515-54HL4M-BDV
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B vs Jinko Solar JKM510-54HL4M-BDV
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B vs Jinko Solar JKM505-54HL4M-BDV
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B vs Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B vs Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B or Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV has higher module efficiency (23.38% vs 21.27%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B and Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B has a module efficiency of 21.27%, while Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV is 23.38%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B use vs Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B uses N-type cells; Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B and Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B and Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV bifacial panels?
Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 132 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
