Skip to main content
JAM78S30-590/MR vs JAM66D46-740/LB 3 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB

JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR
JAM78S30-590/MR
590 Wp 21.10 % PERC
VS
JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB
JAM66D46-740/LB
740 Wp 23.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

JAM66D46-740/LB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.70 pp more efficient. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 16 differences
How alike are they
3 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

16 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM78S30-590/MR JAM66D46-740/LB Difference
Module efficiency 21.10 % 23.80 % 2.70 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 590 Wp 740 Wp 150 W more power
Power density 211.1 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² 27.2 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.15 %/yr slower
Weight 30.5 kg 38.2 kg 7.7 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 13.93 A 18.73 A 4.80 A apart
Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 53.30 V 49.80 V 3.50 V apart
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Current at max power 13.17 A 17.64 A 4.47 A apart
Cell count 156 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Voltage at max power 44.80 V 41.96 V 2.84 V apart
Dimensions 2465x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JAM78S30-590/MR
19,121 kWh
JAM66D46-740/LB
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,707 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM78S30-590/MR JAM66D46-740/LB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 590 W 740 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 559 W 708 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 528 W 676 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 497 W 643 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM78S30-590/MR JAM66D46-740/LB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 590 Wp 740 Wp +150 W for JAM66D46-740/LB
Module efficiency 21.10 % 23.80 % +2.70 pp for JAM66D46-740/LB
Power density 211.1 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² +27.2 Wp/m² for JAM66D46-740/LB
Open-circuit voltage 53.30 V 49.80 V 3.50 V apart
Voltage at max power 44.80 V 41.96 V 2.84 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.93 A 18.73 A 4.80 A apart
Current at max power 13.17 A 17.64 A 4.47 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for JAM66D46-740/LB
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart
Weight 30.5 kg 38.2 kg -7.7 kg for JAM78S30-590/MR
Weight per kWp 51.7 kg/kWp 51.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for JAM66D46-740/LB
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.15 %/yr for JAM66D46-740/LB
Technology
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#9,365 vs #462
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 8,903 places
Power density
#9,360 vs #460
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 8,900 places
Heat behaviour
#10,489 vs #2,220
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 8,269 places
Weight
#5,108 vs #5,026
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 82 places
Warranty
#9,912 vs #21
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#6,853 vs #185
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 6,668 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR vs JA Solar JAM78S30-605/MR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR vs JA Solar JAM78S30-600/MR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR vs JA Solar JAM78S30-595/MR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR vs JA Solar JAM78S30-585/MR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR vs JA Solar JAM78S30-580/MR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR or JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 21.10%); JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR has a module efficiency of 21.10%, while JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR use vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR uses PERC cells; JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR has a 25 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB bifacial panels?
JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); JA Solar JAM78S30-590/MR is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 318 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.