Skip to main content
JAM72S20-450/MR vs LR5-54HTH-425M 3 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR vs Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M

JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR
JAM72S20-450/MR
450 Wp 20.30 % PERC
VS
Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M
LR5-54HTH-425M
425 Wp 21.80 %
The verdict

LR5-54HTH-425M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.50 pp more efficient. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
3 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

15 of 18 parameters
Parameter JAM72S20-450/MR LR5-54HTH-425M Difference
Module efficiency 20.30 % 21.80 % 1.50 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Power density 202.5 Wp/m² 217.6 Wp/m² 15.1 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.15 %/yr slower
Weight 24.5 kg 20.8 kg 3.7 kg lighter
Rated power 450 Wp 425 Wp 25 W more power
Product warranty 12 yrs 15 yrs 3 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 54.4 kg/kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 5.5 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 49.70 V 38.93 V 10.77 V apart
Short-circuit current 11.36 A 14.07 A 2.71 A apart
Module area 2.222 m² 1.953 m² 0.269 m² apart
Voltage at max power 41.52 V 32.64 V 8.88 V apart
Current at max power 10.84 A 13.03 A 2.19 A apart
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Dimensions 2112x1052x35 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2112x1052x35 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JAM72S20-450/MR
14,584 kWh
LR5-54HTH-425M
14,183 kWh
Lifetime gap
401 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM72S20-450/MR LR5-54HTH-425M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 450 W 425 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 426 W 407 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 403 W 388 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 379 W 370 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM72S20-450/MR LR5-54HTH-425M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 450 Wp 425 Wp +25 W for JAM72S20-450/MR
Module efficiency 20.30 % 21.80 % +1.50 pp for LR5-54HTH-425M
Power density 202.5 Wp/m² 217.6 Wp/m² +15.1 Wp/m² for LR5-54HTH-425M
Open-circuit voltage 49.70 V 38.93 V 10.77 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.52 V 32.64 V 8.88 V apart
Short-circuit current 11.36 A 14.07 A 2.71 A apart
Current at max power 10.84 A 13.03 A 2.19 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for LR5-54HTH-425M
Mechanical
Dimensions 2112x1052x35 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2112x1052x35 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.222 m² 1.953 m² 0.269 m² apart
Weight 24.5 kg 20.8 kg -3.7 kg for LR5-54HTH-425M
Weight per kWp 54.4 kg/kWp 48.9 kg/kWp -5.5 kg/kWp for LR5-54HTH-425M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 15 yrs +3 yrs for LR5-54HTH-425M
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.15 %/yr for LR5-54HTH-425M
Technology
Cell technology PERC - Not published by Longi Solar
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#11,851 vs #7,085
LR5-54HTH-425M leads by 4,766 places
Power density
#11,930 vs #7,235
LR5-54HTH-425M leads by 4,695 places
Heat behaviour
#10,489 vs #2,220
LR5-54HTH-425M leads by 8,269 places
Weight
#8,835 vs #2,630
LR5-54HTH-425M leads by 6,205 places
Warranty
#9,912 vs #9,912
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#11,505 vs #10,559
LR5-54HTH-425M leads by 946 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR vs JA Solar JAM72S20-470/MR
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR vs JA Solar JAM72S20-465/MR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR vs JA Solar JAM72S20-460/MR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR vs JA Solar JAM72S20-455/MR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR vs JA Solar JAM72S20-445/MR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-615M
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR or Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M has higher module efficiency (21.80% vs 20.30%); Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR and Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M?
JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR has a module efficiency of 20.30%, while Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M is 21.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR use vs Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M?
JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR uses PERC cells; Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M uses Monocrystalline. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR and Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M?
JA Solar JAM72S20-450/MR has a 25 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR5-54HTH-425M has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Compare JA Solar and Longi Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 330 JA Solar offers · See 152 Longi Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.