Skip to main content
JAM54D41-440/LB vs HN18N-54HT440W 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB vs Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W

JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB
JAM54D41-440/LB
440 Wp 22.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W
Hanersun
HN18N-54HT440W
440 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

HN18N-54HT440W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM54D41-440/LB HN18N-54HT440W Difference
Module efficiency 22.00 % 22.50 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs 10 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 55.7 kg/kWp 5.7 kg/kWp lighter
Weight 22.0 kg 24.5 kg 2.5 kg lighter
Power density 220.2 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Module area 1.998 m² 1.953 m² 0.045 m² apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JAM54D41-440/LB
14,763 kWh
HN18N-54HT440W
14,763 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM54D41-440/LB HN18N-54HT440W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 440 W 440 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 421 W 422 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 402 W 403 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 383 W 385 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM54D41-440/LB HN18N-54HT440W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 440 Wp 440 Wp Same
Module efficiency 22.00 % 22.50 % +0.50 pp for HN18N-54HT440W
Power density 220.2 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for HN18N-54HT440W
Open-circuit voltage 38.90 V 38.70 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 32.29 V 32.70 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.37 A 14.26 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.63 A 13.46 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for HN18N-54HT440W
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 1.953 m² 0.045 m² apart
Weight 22.0 kg 24.5 kg -2.5 kg for JAM54D41-440/LB
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 55.7 kg/kWp -5.7 kg/kWp for JAM54D41-440/LB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs +10 yrs for HN18N-54HT440W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#6,580 vs #4,281
HN18N-54HT440W leads by 2,299 places
Power density
#6,391 vs #4,158
HN18N-54HT440W leads by 2,233 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #1,347
HN18N-54HT440W leads by 873 places
Weight
#3,329 vs #10,132
JAM54D41-440/LB leads by 6,803 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,373 vs #6,681
HN18N-54HT440W leads by 2,692 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LB
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LB
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-455/LB
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB or Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W?
According to our database: Hanersun HN18N-54HT440 W has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 22.00%); Hanersun HN18N-54HT440 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB and Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W?
JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB has a module efficiency of 22.00%, while Hanersun HN18N-54HT440 W is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB use vs Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W?
JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB uses TOPCon cells; Hanersun HN18N-54HT440 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB and Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W?
JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB has a 30 years power warranty; Hanersun HN18N-54HT440 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB and Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LB and Hanersun HN18N-54HT440 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare JA Solar and Hanersun as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 318 JA Solar offers · See 13 Hanersun offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.