Skip to main content
JAM54D41 430/LB vs JAM54D40-470/LB 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB

JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB
JAM54D41 430/LB
430 Wp 21.50 % N-type Bifacial
VS
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB
JAM54D40-470/LB
470 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

JAM54D40-470/LB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.00 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM54D41 430/LB JAM54D40-470/LB Difference
Module efficiency 21.50 % 23.50 % 2.00 pp more efficient
Rated power 430 Wp 470 Wp 40 W more power
Power density 215.2 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² 20.0 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty 12 yrs 15 yrs 3 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 51.2 kg/kWp 46.8 kg/kWp 4.4 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Short-circuit current 14.14 A 15.16 A 1.02 A apart
Open-circuit voltage 38.50 V 40.00 V 1.50 V apart
Voltage at max power 32.12 V 33.50 V 1.38 V apart
Current at max power 13.39 A 14.03 A 0.64 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM54D41 430/LB
14,427 kWh
JAM54D40-470/LB
15,769 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,342 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM54D41 430/LB JAM54D40-470/LB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 430 W 470 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 411 W 450 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 393 W 429 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 374 W 409 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM54D41 430/LB JAM54D40-470/LB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 430 Wp 470 Wp +40 W for JAM54D40-470/LB
Module efficiency 21.50 % 23.50 % +2.00 pp for JAM54D40-470/LB
Power density 215.2 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² +20.0 Wp/m² for JAM54D40-470/LB
Open-circuit voltage 38.50 V 40.00 V 1.50 V apart
Voltage at max power 32.12 V 33.50 V 1.38 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.14 A 15.16 A 1.02 A apart
Current at max power 13.39 A 14.03 A 0.64 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 22.0 kg 22.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 51.2 kg/kWp 46.8 kg/kWp -4.4 kg/kWp for JAM54D40-470/LB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 15 yrs +3 yrs for JAM54D40-470/LB
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#8,022 vs #749
JAM54D40-470/LB leads by 7,273 places
Power density
#7,880 vs #707
JAM54D40-470/LB leads by 7,173 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,546 vs #1,356
JAM54D40-470/LB leads by 3,190 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,453 vs #6,393
JAM54D40-470/LB leads by 4,060 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LB
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LB
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LB
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-455/LB
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D41 455/LB
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB or JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 21.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB and JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB has a module efficiency of 21.50%, while JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB use vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB uses N-type cells; JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB and JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB and JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM54D41 430/LB and JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 320 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.