Skip to main content
JAM54D40-470/LR vs JAM66D46-730/LB 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR vs JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB

JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR
JAM54D40-470/LR
470 Wp 23.50 % N-type
VS
JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB
JAM66D46-730/LB
730 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

JAM54D40-470/LR leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 260 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM54D40-470/LR JAM66D46-730/LB Difference
Rated power 470 Wp 730 Wp 260 W more power
Weight 22.0 kg 38.2 kg 16.2 kg lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 46.8 kg/kWp 52.3 kg/kWp 5.5 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 40.40 V 49.40 V 9.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.66 A 18.67 A 4.01 A apart
Module area 1.998 m² 3.106 m² 1.108 m² apart
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power 33.84 V 41.58 V 7.74 V apart
Current at max power 13.89 A 17.56 A 3.67 A apart
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM54D40-470/LR
15,769 kWh
JAM66D46-730/LB
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,724 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM54D40-470/LR JAM66D46-730/LB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 470 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 450 W 698 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 429 W 666 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 409 W 635 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM54D40-470/LR JAM66D46-730/LB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 470 Wp 730 Wp +260 W for JAM66D46-730/LB
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.50 % Same
Power density 235.2 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 40.40 V 49.40 V 9.00 V apart
Voltage at max power 33.84 V 41.58 V 7.74 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.66 A 18.67 A 4.01 A apart
Current at max power 13.89 A 17.56 A 3.67 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 3.106 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight 22.0 kg 38.2 kg -16.2 kg for JAM54D40-470/LR
Weight per kWp 46.8 kg/kWp 52.3 kg/kWp -5.5 kg/kWp for JAM54D40-470/LR
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for JAM54D40-470/LR
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#749 vs #749
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#707 vs #836
JAM54D40-470/LR leads by 129 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,356 vs #5,850
JAM54D40-470/LR leads by 4,494 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,393 vs #316
JAM66D46-730/LB leads by 6,077 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR vs JA Solar JAM54S40-460/LR
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR vs JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LR
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR or JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR and JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR use vs JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR uses N-type cells; JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR and JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR and JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB bifacial panels?
JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 315 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.