IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M
VS
The verdict
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.92 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
YH720W-33MHD/MH
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Difference
Module efficiency
23.18 %
24.10 %
0.92 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.090 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
720 Wp
775 Wp
55 W more power
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
241.3 Wp/m²
9.5 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
15 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
49.82 V
58.82 V
9.00 V apart
Module area
3.106 m²
3.212 m²
0.106 m² apart
Short-circuit current
18.13 A
16.71 A
1.42 A apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
Back Contact
TOPCon vs Back Contact
Weight per kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
49.9 kg/kWp
2.8 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
41.52 V
48.87 V
7.35 V apart
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Current at max power
17.34 A
15.86 A
1.48 A apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
YH720W-33MHD/MH
24,157 kWh
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
26,003 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,846 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
YH720W-33MHD/MH
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
775 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
682 W
745 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
644 W
715 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
607 W
684 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
YH720W-33MHD/MH
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
775 Wp
+55 W for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Module efficiency
23.18 %
24.10 %
+0.92 pp for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
241.3 Wp/m²
+9.5 Wp/m² for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Open-circuit voltage
49.82 V
58.82 V
9.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.52 V
48.87 V
7.35 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.13 A
16.71 A
1.42 A apart
Current at max power
17.34 A
15.86 A
1.48 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.090 %/°C for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.212 m²
0.106 m² apart
Weight
38.0 kg
38.7 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
49.9 kg/kWp
-2.8 kg/kWp for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
+15 yrs for YH720W-33MHD/MH
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.35 %/yr
Not published by IBC Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
Back Contact
TOPCon vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,424
vs
#219
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads by 1,205 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#227
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads by 1,120 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419
vs
#511
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads by 9,908 places
Weight
#6,459
vs
#3,297
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads by 3,162 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#24
vs
#29
YH720W-33MHD/MH leads by 5 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH710W-33MHD/MH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-770M
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-765M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-760M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH or Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M?
According to our database: Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 23.18%); Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M is 24.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH use vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH uses TOPCon cells; Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a 30 years power warranty; Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M bifacial panels?
Both IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH and Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 2 IBC Solar offers · See 7 Gokin offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
