Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M vs IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH
VS
The verdict
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.92 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
YH720W-33MHD/MH
Difference
Module efficiency
24.10 %
23.18 %
0.92 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.090 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
775 Wp
720 Wp
55 W more power
Power density
241.3 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
9.5 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
15 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
58.82 V
49.82 V
9.00 V apart
Module area
3.212 m²
3.106 m²
0.106 m² apart
Short-circuit current
16.71 A
18.13 A
1.42 A apart
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Weight per kWp
49.9 kg/kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
2.8 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
48.87 V
41.52 V
7.35 V apart
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Current at max power
15.86 A
17.34 A
1.48 A apart
Dimensions
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
26,003 kWh
YH720W-33MHD/MH
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,846 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
YH720W-33MHD/MH
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
775 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
745 W
682 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
715 W
644 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
684 W
607 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
GK-4-78HGBD-775M
YH720W-33MHD/MH
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
775 Wp
720 Wp
+55 W for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Module efficiency
24.10 %
23.18 %
+0.92 pp for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Power density
241.3 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
+9.5 Wp/m² for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Open-circuit voltage
58.82 V
49.82 V
9.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
48.87 V
41.52 V
7.35 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.71 A
18.13 A
1.42 A apart
Current at max power
15.86 A
17.34 A
1.48 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.090 %/°C for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.212 m²
3.106 m²
0.106 m² apart
Weight
38.7 kg
38.0 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
49.9 kg/kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
-2.8 kg/kWp for GK-4-78HGBD-775M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
+15 yrs for YH720W-33MHD/MH
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
-
Not published by IBC Solar
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#219
vs
#1,424
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads by 1,205 places
Power density
#227
vs
#1,347
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads by 1,120 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#10,419
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads by 9,908 places
Weight
#3,297
vs
#6,459
GK-4-78HGBD-775M leads by 3,162 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#29
vs
#24
YH720W-33MHD/MH leads by 5 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-770M
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-765M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-760M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH710W-33MHD/MH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M or IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
According to our database: Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 23.18%); Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M and IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M has a module efficiency of 24.10%, while IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M use vs IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M uses Back Contact cells; IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M and IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M has a 30 years power warranty; IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M and IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH bifacial panels?
Both Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M and IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 7 Gokin offers · See 2 IBC Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
