HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715W vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550W
VS
The verdict
HT66-210(ND)-F 715W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.70 pp more efficient. 2 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 16 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
16 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
HT66-210(ND)-F 715W
HT72-18X 550W
Difference
Module efficiency
23.00 %
21.30 %
1.70 pp more efficient
Rated power
715 Wp
550 Wp
165 W more power
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
212.8 Wp/m²
17.4 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight
38.5 kg
28.5 kg
10.0 kg lighter
Product warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.310 %/°C
-0.330 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Short-circuit current
18.49 A
14.00 A
4.49 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.584 m²
0.522 m² apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Current at max power
17.24 A
13.12 A
4.12 A apart
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
2.0 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Open-circuit voltage
48.40 V
49.80 V
1.40 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2279x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HT66-210(ND)-F 715W
23,990 kWh
HT72-18X 550W
18,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,833 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
HT66-210(ND)-F 715W
HT72-18X 550W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
550 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.0% of rated power
682 W
523 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.1% of rated power
649 W
496 W
Hot roof
70 °C
85.2% of rated power
615 W
468 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
HT66-210(ND)-F 715W
HT72-18X 550W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
550 Wp
+165 W for HT66-210(ND)-F 715W
Module efficiency
23.00 %
21.30 %
+1.70 pp for HT66-210(ND)-F 715W
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
212.8 Wp/m²
+17.4 Wp/m² for HT66-210(ND)-F 715W
Open-circuit voltage
48.40 V
49.80 V
1.40 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.50 V
41.95 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.49 A
14.00 A
4.49 A apart
Current at max power
17.24 A
13.12 A
4.12 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.310 %/°C
-0.330 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for HT66-210(ND)-F 715W
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2279x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.584 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight
38.5 kg
28.5 kg
-10.0 kg for HT72-18X 550W
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
-2.0 kg/kWp for HT72-18X 550W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for HT66-210(ND)-F 715W
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for HT66-210(ND)-F 715W
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
-
Not published by HT-SAAE
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,970
vs
#8,585
HT66-210(ND)-F 715W leads by 6,615 places
Power density
#2,070
vs
#8,709
HT66-210(ND)-F 715W leads by 6,639 places
Heat behaviour
#8,069
vs
#8,613
HT66-210(ND)-F 715W leads by 544 places
Weight
#7,974
vs
#5,236
HT72-18X 550W leads by 2,738 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,912
HT66-210(ND)-F 715W leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#43
vs
#5,257
HT66-210(ND)-F 715W leads by 5,214 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715W vs HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 710W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715W vs HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 705W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715W vs HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715W vs HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 695W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550W vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X 560W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550W vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X 555W
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715W or HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550W?
According to our database: HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 21.30%); HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.310%/°C vs -0.330%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715W and HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550W?
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715 W has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550 W is 21.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715W use vs HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550W?
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715 W uses TOPCon cells; HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715W and HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550W?
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715 W has a 30 years power warranty; HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550 W has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715W and HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550W bifacial panels?
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); HT-SAAE HT72-18X 550 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
