HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W vs HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 695W
VS
The verdict
Identical on every published parameter
All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.
How alike are they
19
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
0 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
700W
23,486 kWh
695W
23,319 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
700W
695W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
700 W
695 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.3% of rated power
667 W
663 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.7% of rated power
635 W
630 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.0% of rated power
602 W
598 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
700W
695W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
700 Wp
695 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
22.50 %
22.40 %
Effectively the same
Power density
225.3 Wp/m²
223.7 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
47.80 V
47.60 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
40.90 V
40.70 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.37 A
18.33 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.12 A
17.08 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.310 %/°C
-0.310 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.5 kg
38.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
55.0 kg/kWp
55.4 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,281
vs
#4,834
700W leads by 553 places
Power density
#4,048
vs
#4,939
700W leads by 891 places
Heat behaviour
#8,069
vs
#8,069
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,445
vs
#9,901
700W leads by 456 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#120
vs
#145
700W leads by 25 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W vs HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 715W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W vs HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 710W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W vs HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 705W
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W vs HT-SAAE HT66-18X(N)-630W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W vs HT-SAAE HT66-18X(N)-625W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W vs HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 620W
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W or HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 695W?
According to our database: HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700 W has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W and HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 695W?
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700 W has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 695 W is 22.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W use vs HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 695W?
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700 W uses TOPCon cells; HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 695 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W and HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 695W?
HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700 W has a 30 years power warranty; HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 695 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700W and HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 695W bifacial panels?
Both HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 700 W and HT-SAAE HT66-210(ND)-F 695 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.