Skip to main content
F-615 vs F 610W 18 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 vs HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 610W

HT-SAAE
HT66-18X(ND)-F-615
615 Wp 22.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
HT-SAAE
HT66-18X(ND)-F 610W
610 Wp 22.60 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

F-615 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See the one difference
How alike are they
18 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

1 of 19 parameters
Parameter F-615 F 610W Difference
Module efficiency 22.80 % 22.60 % 0.20 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
F-615
20,634 kWh
F 610W
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario F-615 F 610W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 615 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 586 W 582 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 558 W 553 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 529 W 525 W
03

Full specification

Parameter F-615 F 610W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 615 Wp 610 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.80 % 22.60 % +0.20 pp for F-615
Power density 227.7 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.10 V 47.90 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.00 V 39.80 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.10 A 16.05 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.38 A 15.33 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.310 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x35 mm 2382x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 33.5 kg 33.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.5 kg/kWp 54.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#2,769 vs #3,716
F-615 leads by 947 places
Power density
#3,132 vs #3,788
F-615 leads by 656 places
Heat behaviour
#8,069 vs #8,069
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,895 vs #9,375
F-615 leads by 480 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#720 vs #917
F-615 leads by 197 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 vs HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 620W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 vs HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-620
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 vs HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 615W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 vs HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-610
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 vs HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 605W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 vs HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-605
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 or HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 610W?
According to our database: HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 has higher module efficiency (22.80% vs 22.60%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 and HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 610W?
HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 has a module efficiency of 22.80%, while HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 610 W is 22.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 use vs HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 610W?
HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 uses TOPCon cells; HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 610 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 and HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 610W?
HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 has a 30 years power warranty; HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 610 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 and HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 610W bifacial panels?
Both HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F-615 and HT-SAAE HT66-18X(ND)-F 610 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.