Skip to main content
475W vs 520W 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520W

HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W
HT-SAAE
HT54-18X(N)-475W
475 Wp 23.80 % TOPCon
VS
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520W
HT-SAAE
HT54-18X(N)-520W
520 Wp 23.40 % TOPCon
The verdict

8 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 45 W more power. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter 475W 520W Difference
Rated power 475 Wp 520 Wp 45 W more power
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.40 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Module area 1.998 m² 2.223 m² 0.225 m² apart
Weight 21.0 kg 23.5 kg 2.5 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 14.85 A 16.26 A 1.41 A apart
Power density 237.7 Wp/m² 234.0 Wp/m² 3.8 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power 14.20 A 15.67 A 1.47 A apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
475W
15,937 kWh
520W
17,447 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,510 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 475W 520W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 475 W 520 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 453 W 496 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 431 W 472 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 409 W 447 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 475W 520W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 475 Wp 520 Wp +45 W for 520W
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.40 % +0.40 pp for 475W
Power density 237.7 Wp/m² 234.0 Wp/m² +3.8 Wp/m² for 475W
Open-circuit voltage 40.00 V 40.00 V Same
Voltage at max power 33.50 V 33.20 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.85 A 16.26 A 1.41 A apart
Current at max power 14.20 A 15.67 A 1.47 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.310 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.223 m² 0.225 m² apart
Weight 21.0 kg 23.5 kg -2.5 kg for 475W
Weight per kWp 44.2 kg/kWp 45.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#462 vs #919
475W leads by 457 places
Power density
#497 vs #935
475W leads by 438 places
Heat behaviour
#8,069 vs #8,069
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#396 vs #635
475W leads by 239 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,711 vs #1,916
520W leads by 795 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-515W
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510W
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-505W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-465W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W or HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520W?
According to our database: HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475 W has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475 W has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520 W is 23.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W use vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475 W uses TOPCon cells; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475 W has a 30 years power warranty; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.