Skip to main content
HS490TC-MHA-D vs HS710TC-MHG-D 7 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D vs Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D

HS490TC-MHA-D
490 Wp 22.20 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
HS710TC-MHG-D
710 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

HS710TC-MHG-D leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
7 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

11 of 18 parameters
Parameter HS490TC-MHA-D HS710TC-MHG-D Difference
Module efficiency 22.20 % 22.90 % 0.70 pp more efficient
Rated power 490 Wp 710 Wp 220 W more power
Weight 26.0 kg 38.5 kg 12.5 kg lighter
Power density 221.0 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² 7.5 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage 43.35 V 49.00 V 5.65 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.31 A 18.40 A 4.09 A apart
Module area 2.217 m² 3.106 m² 0.889 m² apart
Voltage at max power 36.17 V 40.90 V 4.73 V apart
Current at max power 13.55 A 17.36 A 3.81 A apart
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Dimensions 1955x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1955x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
HS490TC-MHA-D
16,440 kWh
HS710TC-MHG-D
23,822 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,382 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HS490TC-MHA-D HS710TC-MHG-D
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 490 W 710 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 469 W 680 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 449 W 650 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 428 W 621 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HS490TC-MHA-D HS710TC-MHG-D Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 490 Wp 710 Wp +220 W for HS710TC-MHG-D
Module efficiency 22.20 % 22.90 % +0.70 pp for HS710TC-MHG-D
Power density 221.0 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² +7.5 Wp/m² for HS710TC-MHG-D
Open-circuit voltage 43.35 V 49.00 V 5.65 V apart
Voltage at max power 36.17 V 40.90 V 4.73 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.31 A 18.40 A 4.09 A apart
Current at max power 13.55 A 17.36 A 3.81 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1955x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1955x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.217 m² 3.106 m² 0.889 m² apart
Weight 26.0 kg 38.5 kg -12.5 kg for HS490TC-MHA-D
Weight per kWp 53.1 kg/kWp 54.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by Horay Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,881 vs #2,412
HS710TC-MHG-D leads by 3,469 places
Power density
#6,062 vs #2,529
HS710TC-MHG-D leads by 3,533 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347 vs #1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,877 vs #8,537
HS490TC-MHA-D leads by 1,660 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,388 vs #607
HS710TC-MHG-D leads by 6,781 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D vs Horay Solar HS510TC-MHA-D
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D vs Horay Solar HS505TC-MHA-D
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D vs Horay Solar HS500TC-MHA-D
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D vs Horay Solar HS495TC-MHA-D
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D vs Horay Solar HS720TC-MHG-D
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D vs Horay Solar HS700TC-MHG-D
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D or Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D?
According to our database: Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D has higher module efficiency (22.90% vs 22.20%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D and Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D?
Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D has a module efficiency of 22.20%, while Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D is 22.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D use vs Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D?
Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D uses TOPCon cells; Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D and Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D?
Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D has a 30 years power warranty; Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D and Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D bifacial panels?
Both Horay Solar HS490TC-MHA-D and Horay Solar HS710TC-MHG-D are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.