Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W
VS
The verdict
1.2 FullBlack 280W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 435 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
2.2 715
1.2 FullBlack 280W
Difference
Rated power
715 Wp
280 Wp
435 W more power
Weight
37.9 kg
14.3 kg
23.6 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
30 yrs
18 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
49.11 V
24.11 V
25.00 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.50 A
14.72 A
3.78 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
1.201 m²
1.905 m² apart
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.31 %
0.31 pp more efficient
Cell technology
TOPCon
Back Contact
TOPCon vs Back Contact
Voltage at max power
40.86 V
20.49 V
20.37 V apart
Current at max power
17.50 A
13.67 A
3.83 A apart
Cell count
132
64
68 cells apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1560x770x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1560x770x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
2.2 715
23,546 kWh
1.2 FullBlack 280W
9,221 kWh
Lifetime gap
14,325 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
2.2 715
1.2 FullBlack 280W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
280 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
685 W
269 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
655 W
258 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
625 W
247 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
2.2 715
1.2 FullBlack 280W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
280 Wp
+435 W for 2.2 715
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.31 %
+0.31 pp for 1.2 FullBlack 280W
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
233.1 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.11 V
24.11 V
25.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.86 V
20.49 V
20.37 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.50 A
14.72 A
3.78 A apart
Current at max power
17.50 A
13.67 A
3.83 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for 1.2 FullBlack 280W
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1560x770x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1560x770x35 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
1.201 m²
1.905 m² apart
Weight
37.9 kg
14.3 kg
-23.6 kg for 1.2 FullBlack 280W
Weight per kWp
53.0 kg/kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
30 yrs
+18 yrs for 1.2 FullBlack 280W
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
Back Contact
TOPCon vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
64
68 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
13,953 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,892
vs
#1,004
1.2 FullBlack 280W leads by 888 places
Power density
#1,992
vs
#1,084
1.2 FullBlack 280W leads by 908 places
Heat behaviour
#1,290
vs
#511
1.2 FullBlack 280W leads by 779 places
Weight
#6,704
vs
#4,382
1.2 FullBlack 280W leads by 2,322 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#668
vs
#9,692
2.2 715 leads by 9,024 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2-715
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 710
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2-710
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-640
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1 640W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 or Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W?
According to our database: Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280 W has higher module efficiency (23.31% vs 23.00%); Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 and Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280 W is 23.31%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 use vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 uses TOPCon cells; Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280 W uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 and Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 has a 30 years power warranty; Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 and Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W bifacial panels?
Both Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715 and Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 16 Heckert Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.