Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635
Heckert Solar
ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W
280 Wp
23.31 %
Back Contact
Bifacial
VS
The verdict
1.2 FullBlack 280W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 355 W more power. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
12 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
1.2 FullBlack 280W
2.1-635
Difference
Rated power
280 Wp
635 Wp
355 W more power
Weight
14.3 kg
32.5 kg
18.2 kg lighter
Product warranty
30 yrs
12 yrs
18 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
24.11 V
49.60 V
25.49 V apart
Module area
1.201 m²
2.701 m²
1.500 m² apart
Short-circuit current
14.72 A
16.26 A
1.54 A apart
Cell technology
Back Contact
N-type
Back Contact vs N-type
Voltage at max power
20.49 V
41.24 V
20.75 V apart
Cell count
64
132
68 cells apart
Current at max power
13.67 A
15.40 A
1.73 A apart
Dimensions
1560x770x35 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1560x770x35 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
1.2 FullBlack 280W
9,221 kWh
2.1-635
20,911 kWh
Lifetime gap
11,690 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
1.2 FullBlack 280W
2.1-635
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
280 W
635 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
269 W
608 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
258 W
582 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
247 W
555 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
1.2 FullBlack 280W
2.1-635
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
280 Wp
635 Wp
+355 W for 2.1-635
Module efficiency
23.31 %
23.50 %
Effectively the same
Power density
233.1 Wp/m²
235.1 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
24.11 V
49.60 V
25.49 V apart
Voltage at max power
20.49 V
41.24 V
20.75 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.72 A
16.26 A
1.54 A apart
Current at max power
13.67 A
15.40 A
1.73 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for 1.2 FullBlack 280W
Mechanical
Dimensions
1560x770x35 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1560x770x35 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.201 m²
2.701 m²
1.500 m² apart
Weight
14.3 kg
32.5 kg
-18.2 kg for 1.2 FullBlack 280W
Weight per kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
51.2 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
12 yrs
+18 yrs for 1.2 FullBlack 280W
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
N-type
Back Contact vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
64
132
68 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,055
vs
#749
2.1-635 leads by 306 places
Power density
#1,136
vs
#777
2.1-635 leads by 359 places
Heat behaviour
#515
vs
#1,347
1.2 FullBlack 280W leads by 832 places
Weight
#4,429
vs
#4,581
1.2 FullBlack 280W leads by 152 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,828
vs
#1,760
2.1-635 leads by 8,068 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 275W
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 270W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635 vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-640
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635 vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1 640W
2 differences, the largest is cell technology
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635 vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1 635W
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635 vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2-280
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W or Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635?
According to our database: Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.31%); Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W and Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280 W has a module efficiency of 23.31%, while Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635 is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W use vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280 W uses Back Contact cells; Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W and Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280 W has a 30 years power warranty; Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280W and Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635 bifacial panels?
Both Heckert Solar ZEUS 1.2 FullBlack 280 W and Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.1-635 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 16 Heckert Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.