Skip to main content
HN21N-66HT750W vs HN18-72H570W 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W vs Hanersun HN18-72H570W

Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W
Hanersun
HN21N-66HT750W
750 Wp 24.10 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Hanersun HN18-72H570W
Hanersun
HN18-72H570W
570 Wp 22.07 % TOPCon
The verdict

HN21N-66HT750W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.03 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter HN21N-66HT750W HN18-72H570W Difference
Module efficiency 24.10 % 22.07 % 2.03 pp more efficient
Rated power 750 Wp 570 Wp 180 W more power
Power density 241.4 Wp/m² 220.7 Wp/m² 20.8 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.310 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight 37.4 kg 28.5 kg 8.9 kg lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Short-circuit current 18.74 A 14.11 A 4.63 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.583 m² 0.523 m² apart
Current at max power 17.76 A 13.32 A 4.44 A apart
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HN21N-66HT750W
25,164 kWh
HN18-72H570W
19,125 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,039 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HN21N-66HT750W HN18-72H570W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 750 W 570 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 719 W 543 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 687 W 517 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 656 W 490 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HN21N-66HT750W HN18-72H570W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 750 Wp 570 Wp +180 W for HN21N-66HT750W
Module efficiency 24.10 % 22.07 % +2.03 pp for HN21N-66HT750W
Power density 241.4 Wp/m² 220.7 Wp/m² +20.8 Wp/m² for HN21N-66HT750W
Open-circuit voltage 50.20 V 51.00 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.24 V 42.80 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.74 A 14.11 A 4.63 A apart
Current at max power 17.76 A 13.32 A 4.44 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.310 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for HN21N-66HT750W
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.583 m² 0.523 m² apart
Weight 37.4 kg 28.5 kg -8.9 kg for HN18-72H570W
Weight per kWp 49.9 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for HN21N-66HT750W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for HN21N-66HT750W
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#241 vs #6,199
HN21N-66HT750W leads by 5,958 places
Power density
#241 vs #6,121
HN21N-66HT750W leads by 5,880 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347 vs #8,069
HN21N-66HT750W leads by 6,722 places
Weight
#3,263 vs #3,592
HN21N-66HT750W leads by 329 places
Warranty
#21 vs #9,912
HN21N-66HT750W leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#73 vs #6,348
HN21N-66HT750W leads by 6,275 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT745W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT740W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT735W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W vs Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670W
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W vs Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W vs Hanersun HN21RN-66QT660W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W or Hanersun HN18-72H570W?
According to our database: Hanersun HN21N-66HT750 W has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 22.07%); Hanersun HN21N-66HT750 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.310%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W and Hanersun HN18-72H570W?
Hanersun HN21N-66HT750 W has a module efficiency of 24.10%, while Hanersun HN18-72H570 W is 22.07%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W use vs Hanersun HN18-72H570W?
Hanersun HN21N-66HT750 W uses TOPCon cells; Hanersun HN18-72H570 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W and Hanersun HN18-72H570W?
Hanersun HN21N-66HT750 W has a 30 years power warranty; Hanersun HN18-72H570 W has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W and Hanersun HN18-72H570W bifacial panels?
Hanersun HN21N-66HT750 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Hanersun HN18-72H570 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 14 Hanersun offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.