Skip to main content
72H585W vs 72HT595W 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W

Hanersun HN18N-72H585W
Hanersun
HN18N-72H585W
585 Wp 22.60 % TOPCon
VS
Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W
Hanersun
HN18N-72HT595W
595 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

72H585W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is weight: 4.9 kg lighter. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter 72H585W 72HT595W Difference
Weight 26.0 kg 30.9 kg 4.9 kg lighter
Product warranty 25 yrs 15 yrs 10 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 44.4 kg/kWp 51.9 kg/kWp 7.5 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency 22.60 % 23.00 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Power density 226.5 Wp/m² 230.3 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 585 Wp 595 Wp 10 W more power
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
72H585W
19,628 kWh
72HT595W
19,963 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 72H585W 72HT595W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 585 W 595 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 560 W 570 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 536 W 545 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 511 W 520 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 72H585W 72HT595W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 585 Wp 595 Wp +10 W for 72HT595W
Module efficiency 22.60 % 23.00 % +0.40 pp for 72HT595W
Power density 226.5 Wp/m² 230.3 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for 72HT595W
Open-circuit voltage 51.60 V 52.00 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.40 V 43.80 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.29 A 14.41 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.48 A 13.59 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 26.0 kg 30.9 kg -4.9 kg for 72H585W
Weight per kWp 44.4 kg/kWp 51.9 kg/kWp -7.5 kg/kWp for 72H585W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 15 yrs +10 yrs for 72H585W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#3,716 vs #1,970
72HT595W leads by 1,746 places
Power density
#3,557 vs #1,809
72HT595W leads by 1,748 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347 vs #1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#455 vs #5,387
72H585W leads by 4,932 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,740 vs #2,782
72H585W leads by 1,042 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT600W
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H595W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H590W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT590W
5 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18-72HT585W
5 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H585W vs Hanersun HN18-72H585W
5 differences, the largest is performance warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Hanersun HN18N-72H585W or Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W?
According to our database: Hanersun HN18N-72HT595 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.60%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hanersun HN18N-72H585W and Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W?
Hanersun HN18N-72H585 W has a module efficiency of 22.60%, while Hanersun HN18N-72HT595 W is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hanersun HN18N-72H585W use vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W?
Hanersun HN18N-72H585 W uses TOPCon cells; Hanersun HN18N-72HT595 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hanersun HN18N-72H585W and Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W?
Hanersun HN18N-72H585 W has a 30 years power warranty; Hanersun HN18N-72HT595 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hanersun HN18N-72H585W and Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W bifacial panels?
Hanersun HN18N-72HT595 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Hanersun HN18N-72H585 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 14 Hanersun offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.