Skip to main content
HN18-72HT585W vs HN18N-72HT595W 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Hanersun HN18-72HT585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W

Hanersun HN18-72HT585W
Hanersun
HN18-72HT585W
585 Wp 22.65 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W
Hanersun
HN18N-72HT595W
595 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

HN18N-72HT595W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter HN18-72HT585W HN18N-72HT595W Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 22.65 % 23.00 % 0.35 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp 55.6 kg/kWp 51.9 kg/kWp 3.6 kg/kWp lighter
Power density 226.5 Wp/m² 230.3 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight 32.5 kg 30.9 kg 1.6 kg lighter
Rated power 585 Wp 595 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HN18-72HT585W
19,628 kWh
HN18N-72HT595W
19,963 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HN18-72HT585W HN18N-72HT595W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 585 W 595 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 558 W 570 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 531 W 545 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 503 W 520 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HN18-72HT585W HN18N-72HT595W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 585 Wp 595 Wp +10 W for HN18N-72HT595W
Module efficiency 22.65 % 23.00 % +0.35 pp for HN18N-72HT595W
Power density 226.5 Wp/m² 230.3 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for HN18N-72HT595W
Open-circuit voltage 51.60 V 52.00 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.40 V 43.80 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.30 A 14.41 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.49 A 13.59 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for HN18N-72HT595W
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 30.9 kg -1.6 kg for HN18N-72HT595W
Weight per kWp 55.6 kg/kWp 51.9 kg/kWp -3.6 kg/kWp for HN18N-72HT595W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#3,579 vs #1,970
HN18N-72HT595W leads by 1,609 places
Power density
#3,557 vs #1,809
HN18N-72HT595W leads by 1,748 places
Heat behaviour
#8,069 vs #1,347
HN18N-72HT595W leads by 6,722 places
Weight
#9,992 vs #5,387
HN18N-72HT595W leads by 4,605 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,577 vs #2,782
HN18N-72HT595W leads by 795 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18-72HT585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT600W
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18-72HT585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H595W
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18-72HT585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H590W
5 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18-72HT585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT590W
3 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18-72HT585W vs Hanersun HN18-72H585W
5 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18-72HT585W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H585W
5 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Hanersun HN18-72HT585W or Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W?
According to our database: Hanersun HN18N-72HT595 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.65%); Hanersun HN18N-72HT595 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.310%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hanersun HN18-72HT585W and Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W?
Hanersun HN18-72HT585 W has a module efficiency of 22.65%, while Hanersun HN18N-72HT595 W is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hanersun HN18-72HT585W use vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W?
Hanersun HN18-72HT585 W uses TOPCon cells; Hanersun HN18N-72HT595 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hanersun HN18-72HT585W and Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W?
Hanersun HN18-72HT585 W has a 30 years power warranty; Hanersun HN18N-72HT595 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hanersun HN18-72HT585W and Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W bifacial panels?
Both Hanersun HN18-72HT585 W and Hanersun HN18N-72HT595 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 14 Hanersun offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.